Jaka ma być ochrona gatunkowa? Część III. Uwagi o potrzebie zmiany rozporządzenia o ochronie gatunkowej roślin

Fałtynowicz, Wiesław

doi:10.5586/wb.655

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…the reasonableness of restrictions caused by zonal protection in general (Fałtynowicz, 2021a(Fałtynowicz, , 2021b(Fałtynowicz, , 2021c, undertaking this research topic on the eve of subsequent legislative changes becomes particularly important.…”

Section: Sitementioning

confidence: 99%

“…e conflict between nature protection and the economy has a centuries-long tradition, but the basis for administrative decisions taken to protect natural resources should be scientifically justified, especially since it is the awareness of officials that determines the establishment and size of a protection zone. We were looking forward to such justification when undertaking research in the Polish Carpathians on the relationship between the size of protection zones for L. pulmonaria and the diversity of lichen species in the context of the discussion on the proposed changes to the law on the protection of the lichen species (Fałtynowicz, 2021a(Fałtynowicz, , 2021b(Fałtynowicz, , 2021c. e aim of the study was to obtain scientific data that would enable the assessment of the validity of changes in the legal protection of Lobaria pulmonaria in the context of the corticolous lichen diversity conservation, including stenotopic, endangered and legally protected species.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lobaria pulmonaria as an umbrella species for the protection of epiphytic lichen diversity in Polish Carpathians

Czarnota,

Tuchowski,

Szymczyk

et al. 2023

Acta Myc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lobaria pulmonaria has been subject to strict and zonal protection in Poland for almost 20 years, assuming the function of an umbrella species for the protection of natural biodiversity. Knowledge about this function, however, is limited, mainly due to a lack of relevant research. The current protection zone with a radius (R) of up to 50 m was significantly reduced in 2014 compared to the previous one from 2004 (R=100 m), mainly due to the needs of forest management. This legislative change became why it was worth making a scientific balance of potential gains and losses. Corticolous lichens growing at circular sites with a radius of 150 m around lungwort host-trees, divided into three zones R=50 m, R=51-100 m, R=101-150 m, were selected as the biological group for verification. Beech (Fagus sylvatica) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) trees with DBH ≥40 cm, randomly located along the target azimuths of 0°, 120°, and 240°, were selected for the study at 15 sites located in the Polish Carpathians (Gorce and Bieszczady Mts). The research hypothesis was that the size of the L. pulmonaria protection zone in the Polish Carpathians is important for the conservation of a greater diversity of corticolous lichens. Based on the list of species, we assessed the statistical significance of differences in diversity indices between the zones and between the Gorce and Bieszczady sites, which was justified by the result of the DCA analysis. Both the total number of species and old-growth forest, legally protected and endangered species in Poland (categories EN, CR) were analyzed. Generally, the current protection zone with a radius of 50 m protects approx. 70% of all epiphytic lichen diversity and the same share of other investigated groups, while increasing the protection zone to R=100 m saves almost 90% of species representing these groups of lichens.

show abstract

Section: Sitementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lobaria pulmonaria as an umbrella species for the protection of epiphytic lichen diversity in Polish Carpathians

Czarnota,

Tuchowski,

Szymczyk

et al. 2023

Acta Myc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Alien or endangered? Historical development of Chara connivens in the Baltic coastal waters and its implication for the species management

Gruszka

Brzeska-Roszczyk

Pełechaty

2023

Journal for Nature Conservation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Jaka ma być ochrona gatunkowa? Część I. Ochrona gatunkowa porostów, czyli co tak naprawdę chronimy?

Fałtynowicz¹

2021

Wiad Bot

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Streszczenie W artykule podano informacje o wszystkich gatunkach porostów, których lista jest zawarta w Rozporządzeniu Ministra Środowiska z dnia 9 października 2014 r. w sprawie ochrony gatunkowej grzybów. Uporządkowano ich pozycję w systemie, omówiono rozmieszczenie ogólne i w kraju. Przy każdym gatunku podano też sugestie dotyczące potrzeby ich ochrony prawnej. Dogłębna analiza pozwoliła stwierdzić, że to rozporządzenie w rzeczywistości zawiera nie 205, lecz 168 gatunków stwierdzonych w Polsce, z których 29 uznano za wymarłe i niewidziane w kraju od 1970 r. Ponad 30 zamieszczonych w nim nazw okazało się synonimami, a 3 gatunki nigdy u nas nie występowały.

show abstract

Jaka ma być ochrona gatunkowa? Część III. Uwagi o potrzebie zmiany rozporządzenia o ochronie gatunkowej roślin

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

<i>Lobaria pulmonaria</i> as an umbrella species for the protection of epiphytic lichen diversity in Polish Carpathians

<i>Lobaria pulmonaria</i> as an umbrella species for the protection of epiphytic lichen diversity in Polish Carpathians

Alien or endangered? Historical development of Chara connivens in the Baltic coastal waters and its implication for the species management

Jaka ma być ochrona gatunkowa? Część I. Ochrona gatunkowa porostów, czyli co tak naprawdę chronimy?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About