Disasters and Social Crisis in Contemporary Japan 2016
DOI: 10.1057/9781137521323_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japan’s Identity Crisis and Sino-Japanese Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This presents an obstacle to resolving disputes over collective memory (e.g. Rose 2005;Zarakol 2010;Gustafsson 2014;Shibata 2016;Saito 2016). This article is sympathetic to and overlaps in part with this approach, but seeks to contribute to it by highlighting the key role played by forgetting in constructing and maintaining a coherent sense of self.…”
Section: Collective Memory In International Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This presents an obstacle to resolving disputes over collective memory (e.g. Rose 2005;Zarakol 2010;Gustafsson 2014;Shibata 2016;Saito 2016). This article is sympathetic to and overlaps in part with this approach, but seeks to contribute to it by highlighting the key role played by forgetting in constructing and maintaining a coherent sense of self.…”
Section: Collective Memory In International Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, both perpetrator and victim groups can construct and perpetuate competing narratives of their own victimisation. The wounds of past trauma are thus maintained and transmitted through the way in which victim narratives are commemorated, the way history is taught, and passed on through various channels, including popular cultural products (Volkan 2001;Shibata 2016). Competitive narratives of victimhood therefore can protract a conflict between perpetrators and victims and become a significant impediment to the process of reconciliation.…”
Section: Identity and Collective Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abe and the nationalists are therefore on a mission to revise the 'masochist' narrative of war history that defines Japan as a shameful nation that engaged in immoral and illegitimate wars of aggression against its neighbours and deserved the punishment it received based on the verdicts of the Tokyo Trial (Akaha 2008, 157). Nationalist narratives aim to denounce the legitimacy of the Tokyo Trial and the postwar regime imposed by the United States which they claim have destroyed Japanese people's national pride and independence (Shibata 2016). For Japan's Asian neighbours, Abe and other conservative politicians' regular visits to the controversial Yasukuni Shrine, where 14 convicted war criminals are honoured, are the most blatant expression of their refusal to accept responsibility for Japan's history of aggression.…”
Section: Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's Nationalist Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%