Japan-U.S. industry-level productivity comparisons, 1960–1979

Jorgenson, Dale W.; Kuroda, Masahiro; Nishimizu, Mieko

doi:10.1016/0889-1583(87)90025-6

Cited by 69 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 'Jorgensonian' productivity studies (e.g. Jorgenson et al, 1987), productivity levels for, e.g. the transport equipment industry are compared across countries.…”

Section: The Views Of Bart Los: I-o Unchained?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Input–output Analysis: The Next 25 Years

Dietzenbacher¹,

Lenzen²,

Los³

et al. 2013

Economic Systems Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In 'Jorgensonian' productivity studies (e.g. Jorgenson et al, 1987), productivity levels for, e.g. the transport equipment industry are compared across countries.…”

Section: The Views Of Bart Los: I-o Unchained?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Input–output Analysis: The Next 25 Years

Dietzenbacher¹,

Lenzen²,

Los³

et al. 2013

Economic Systems Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The second approach is also used to construct aggregate PPP and first applied to sectoral comparisons in Jorgenson, Kuroda, and Nishimizu (1987). Price and expenditure information comes from consumer surveys and direct retail price surveys.…”

Section: Other Sectoral Currency Conversionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sector-specific conversion factors can be constructed from unit value ratios, as in van Ark and Pilat (1993), or from consumer prices, as in Jorgenson, Kuroda, and Nishimizu (1987) or as is done for aggregate PPP.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-country Conversion Factors for Sectoral Productivity Comparisons

Biesebroeck

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Ball et al 2001, 2007, Jorgenson/Kuroda 1992, Jorgcnson/Nishimizu 1978, Jorgenson et al 1987). For our analysis we always use non-or semi parametric methods when (mis-)specifications could provoke serious disturbances in our conclusions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Empirical Assessment of the EU Agricultural Policy Based on Firm Level Data

Murillo

Mesonada

Sperlich

2007

Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryThe study focuses on testing the hypothesis that the subsidy system of the Common Agricultural Reform 1n 1992 (CAP'92) drove to changes in farm efficiency towards the thereby claimed objectives. With sequential applications of semiparametric methods we succeed to identify the impact of the direct payments on environmental adaptation, productivity and efficiency before and after CAP'92 without restrictive model specifications. We find that the claimed objectives of the EU subvention policy were met only partly, but that the CAP'92 was, however, a step forward. Our case study uses large Spanish data sets of animal orientated farms. This paper applies non parametric methods for policy evaluation at firm level. The study focuses on testing the hypothesis that the subsidy system of the Common Agricultural Reform in 1992 (CAP'92) drove to changes in farm efficiency towards the thereby claimed objectives. We con~ centrate here on animal oriented farms, in particular cattle, pig, sheep and goat farms. The cor· rect quantification of efficiency and productivity differentials due to CAP'92 is crucial for such a policy analysis as different models can easily lead to different conclusions. Using non parametric methods we do not need to specify the production function of the farms. With sequential appli~ cations of semi parametric methods we succeed to identify the impact of the direct payments on environmental adaptation, productivity and efficiency before and after CAP'92 withou~ restric· tive model specifications. We find that the claimed objectives of the EU subvention pohcy were met only partly, but that the CAP'92 was -at least partly -indeed a step forward in that sense. Our case study uses large Spanish data sets of animal orientated farms. This is justified, among other reasons, by the relevance of these farms for Mediterranean forest and grazing land preservation in Spain.

show abstract

Japan-U.S. industry-level productivity comparisons, 1960–1979

Cited by 69 publications

References 10 publications

Input–output Analysis: The Next 25 Years

Input–output Analysis: The Next 25 Years

Cross-country Conversion Factors for Sectoral Productivity Comparisons

An Empirical Assessment of the EU Agricultural Policy Based on Firm Level Data

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About