2016
DOI: 10.5334/irsp.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

« Je suis Charlie » : New Findings on the Social and Political Psychology of Terrorism [« Je suis Charlie » : Nouvelles Avancées en Psychologie Sociale et Politique du Terrorisme]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Charlie Hebdo was known for its freedom of expression and irreverence on religious matters (Mignot & Goffette, 2015 Nugier & Guimond, 2016). This could make religious Muslims as well as Catholics quite ambivalent toward the rallies for Charlie, and place them at odds with the general atmosphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Charlie Hebdo was known for its freedom of expression and irreverence on religious matters (Mignot & Goffette, 2015 Nugier & Guimond, 2016). This could make religious Muslims as well as Catholics quite ambivalent toward the rallies for Charlie, and place them at odds with the general atmosphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The massacre was followed by shooting in southern suburbs of Paris and hostage taking in Paris kosher supermarket "Hyper Cacher" where four hostages were killed. Highly efficient civil security response took place to pursue the murderers, who were finally shot by the police two days later in northern suburbs of Paris (see also Nugier & Guimond, 2016). These three days of terror not only shattered French citizens' sense of security but were followed by huge spontaneous manifestations of solidarity all over the French territory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third limitation rests in the fact that we have little evidence to explain why one component of the French political model, Historical Laïcité, played an important role whereas the other component, Neo-Laïcité, did not. Previous research likewise reported null effects when predicting outgroup perceptions following jihadist terror through Neo-Laïcité (Anier et al, 2019;Nugier & Guimond, 2016). One explanation could be that Historical Laïcité is more relevant to the French context than Neo-Laïcité and therefore more influential on public opinions.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%