2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2022.3187670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JEDE: Universal Jersey Number Detector for Sports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of jersey number recognition has been posed as image-level recognition [6,17,19,20,25] as well as tracklet-level recognition [4,7,26,27]. Some methods detect and localize the jersey number region and then classify the numbers [17,19,20], while others assume that the im-age region containing the jersey number has already been cropped [6,12,25]. Progress on this problem has been slowed by the lack of large public datasets that can be used to compare methods.…”
Section: Jersey Number Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The problem of jersey number recognition has been posed as image-level recognition [6,17,19,20,25] as well as tracklet-level recognition [4,7,26,27]. Some methods detect and localize the jersey number region and then classify the numbers [17,19,20], while others assume that the im-age region containing the jersey number has already been cropped [6,12,25]. Progress on this problem has been slowed by the lack of large public datasets that can be used to compare methods.…”
Section: Jersey Number Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerke et al [12] and Li et al [17] were among the first to apply CNN-based classification approaches to image-level jersey number recognition, and CNNs have been the dominant approach since this time. Liu et al [19,20] demonstrated the utility of body pose detection to improve classification with Faster R-CNN [22] and Mask R-CNN [16] architectures, respectively.…”
Section: Image-level Jersey Number Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation