2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc7a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet Formation in 3D GRMHD Simulations of Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton Accretion

Abstract: A black hole (BH) traveling through a uniform, gaseous medium is described by Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton (BHL) accretion. If the medium is magnetized, then the black hole can produce relativistic outflows. We performed the first 3D, general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of BHL accretion onto rapidly rotating black holes using the H-AMR code, where we mainly varied the strength of a background magnetic field that threads the medium. We found that the ensuing accretion continuously drags the magnetic f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R a , the material in front of the SB dominates gravitational drag (as opposed to material behind the SB, as when R SB = R a ), and the gravitational drag coefficient becomes negative. Similar results have been found for compact objects with outflows (Gruzinov et al 2020;Li et al 2020;Kaaz et al 2023) and luminous planetesimals moving through a disk (Masset & Velasco Romero 2017;Masset 2017). In those settings, feedback from the object can interfere with the flow at impact parameters ∼R a that the SB would have gravitationally focused had there been no feedback.…”
Section: The Gravitational and Geometrical Regimessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…R a , the material in front of the SB dominates gravitational drag (as opposed to material behind the SB, as when R SB = R a ), and the gravitational drag coefficient becomes negative. Similar results have been found for compact objects with outflows (Gruzinov et al 2020;Li et al 2020;Kaaz et al 2023) and luminous planetesimals moving through a disk (Masset & Velasco Romero 2017;Masset 2017). In those settings, feedback from the object can interfere with the flow at impact parameters ∼R a that the SB would have gravitationally focused had there been no feedback.…”
Section: The Gravitational and Geometrical Regimessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The hyper-Eddington accretion is realizable, since for BHL accretion the inflow is highly quasispherical (e.g., El Mellah & Casse 2015) and the released gravitational energy is advected inward with gas (Begelman 1979). Meanwhile, the AGN disk would be magnetized, with a ratio of ambient gas to magnetic pressure β  10-100 (King et al 2007;Salvesen et al 2016;Kaaz et al 2023a). Recent numerical simulations indicate that the ambient magnetic fields are frozen and flow inward with gas, resulting in their accumulation to saturation near the BH (Kaaz et al 2023a;Kwan et al 2023).…”
Section: Formation and Power Of Bh-driven Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the AGN disk would be magnetized, with a ratio of ambient gas to magnetic pressure β  10-100 (King et al 2007;Salvesen et al 2016;Kaaz et al 2023a). Recent numerical simulations indicate that the ambient magnetic fields are frozen and flow inward with gas, resulting in their accumulation to saturation near the BH (Kaaz et al 2023a;Kwan et al 2023). Due to a large spin of the merger remnant (e.g., Tichy & Marronetti 2008;, a jet would be generated via the Blandford-Znajek (BZ) mechanism (Blandford & Znajek 1977), the power of which can be estimated as…”
Section: Formation and Power Of Bh-driven Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, some attempts to connect these disparate scales have been made using nested simulations where each smallerscale simulation is initialized from the next larger-scale simulation (e.g., Hopkins & Quataert 2010;Ressler et al 2020;Guo et al 2023), or by adopting Lagrangian hyperrefinement methods (e.g., Anglés-Alcázar et al 2021;Hopkins et al 2023), or by pushing out the simulation regime to larger scales (e.g., Lalakos et al 2022;Kaaz et al 2023). While successful in studying the process of accretion, feedback from the SMBH has not been followed out to galaxy scales in prior work because either the communication between scales is only directed inward or because of the inability to include the entire galaxy and the black hole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%