2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep04(2016)097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet shapes in dijet events at the LHC in SCET

Abstract: Abstract:We consider the class of jet shapes known as angularities in dijet production at hadron colliders. These angularities are modified from the original definitions in e + e − collisions to be boost invariant along the beam axis. These shapes apply to the constituents of jets defined with respect to either k T -type (anti-k T , C/A, and k T ) algorithms and conetype algorithms. We present an SCET factorization formula and calculate the ingredients needed to achieve next-to-leading-log (NLL) accuracy in ki… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(116 reference statements)
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For hadron collider event shapes, NNLL resummation has been achieved for zero-jet [9][10][11] and one-jet event shapes [12]. However, many interesting effects, namely non-trivial color evolution and amplitude level factorization violation, first occur for dijet event shapes, for which complete results are only available at NLL [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hadron collider event shapes, NNLL resummation has been achieved for zero-jet [9][10][11] and one-jet event shapes [12]. However, many interesting effects, namely non-trivial color evolution and amplitude level factorization violation, first occur for dijet event shapes, for which complete results are only available at NLL [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters κ ≥ 0 and β ≥ 0 determine the momentum and angle weighting, respectively. For κ = 1, the generalized angularities are IRC safe and hence calculable in perturbation theory [29] (see also [28,[59][60][61][62]), and we will sometimes use the shorthand…”
Section: Generalized Angularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…refs. [14,23,25,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]) and are established as a reliable method to assess the perturbative uncertainty in resummed predictions. Our profile scales are constructed by considering the relative size of the singular and nonsingular cross section contributions, as discussed in appendix B.2.…”
Section: Estimating the Theory Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%