1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021820729518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A plausible mechanism for the present Cu II ‐catalyzed amination reaction is outlined in Scheme . This involves the initial formation of a Cu–1,10‐phen species from the reaction of Cu(OTf) 2 and the 1,10‐phen additive in either the monomeric or polymeric form 12. Further reaction of this Cu–1,10‐phen complex with PhINSO 2 Ar generates the putative highly reactive [Cu]NSO 2 Ar species 13.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plausible mechanism for the present Cu II ‐catalyzed amination reaction is outlined in Scheme . This involves the initial formation of a Cu–1,10‐phen species from the reaction of Cu(OTf) 2 and the 1,10‐phen additive in either the monomeric or polymeric form 12. Further reaction of this Cu–1,10‐phen complex with PhINSO 2 Ar generates the putative highly reactive [Cu]NSO 2 Ar species 13.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic strong bands of carboxylate groups appeared at 1597cm −1 (for asymmetric stretching) and 1341 cm −1 (for symmetric stretching). The difference ( ν = 256 cm −1 ) between ν asym (COO − ) and ν sym (COO − ) bands suggests the presence of chelating acetate group [26,27], which was unambiguously confirmed by the crystal Electronic spectrum 1 displays one peak at about 273 nm, which is charge transfer in origin. The UV absorption peak observed at 378 nm can be assigned to the charge transfer from ligand to the Cu(II) transition.…”
Section: Infrared Spectrummentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Regarding magnetism, some common features linking structure and magnetic behavior have been relatively well established over the years, mainly when the carboxylate acts in a bridging mode, viz., complexes that present monoatomic or syn-anti bridges (Scheme 1) which usually show weak antiferromagnetic interactions, in contrast with those in which the carboxylate bridge is in a syn-syn form, where the interaction is mostly strong and antiferromagnetic. On the other hand, anti-anti modes are not so determinant, as they may produce either ferro-or antiferromagnetic coupling [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%