Untitled

Güner, Güntekin; Gürer, Sezer; Elmalı, Nurzat; Ertem, Kadir

doi:10.1097/00019509-199806000-00015

Cited by 16 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The iliac bone behind the sacroiliac joint is thick, superficial, and has no important nerves and blood vessels, so the risk of exposure is small. Sinus of the groin usually occurs after incision and drainage of an anterior abscess [ 19 ]. Many scholars suggest that sacroiliitis should be removed by a posterior approach for bone grafting [ 20 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical features and surgical management of tuberculous arthritis of the sacroiliac joint: a retrospective analysis of 33 patients

Tian¹,

Cao

et al. 2022

BMC Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background We reviewed 3 different types of tuberculous sacroiliitis via anterior and posterior approaches to determine the efficacy and safety of this surgical approach by describing clinical presentation, imaging, and surgical treatment. Methods We reviewed 33 patients with 3 different types of severe tuberculous sacroiliitis, of which 16 patients with anterior iliac abscess underwent anterior debridement. 17 patients underwent posterior debridement. Among them, 5 patients with lumbar tuberculosis underwent lesion debridement through fenestration, joint fusion, and interbody fusion and internal fixation. The mean postoperative follow-up was 16.9 months (12–25 months).Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to judge the postoperative condition and functional recovery. Results All patients’ hip, back and lower back pain symptoms were significantly relieved after surgical treatment. At 3 months after operation, the VAS and ODI scores of all patients decreased significantly. Conclusion Surgical treatment of tuberculous sacroiliitis should be performed as soon as possible under the adjuvant chemotherapy of anti-tuberculosis drugs. According to the different characteristics of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis, appropriate surgical operations should be adopted according to our classification criteria.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical features and surgical management of tuberculous arthritis of the sacroiliac joint: a retrospective analysis of 33 patients

Tian¹,

Cao

et al. 2022

BMC Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Using anterior debridement and bone graft carries potential risks of side injury. A posterior approach provides a more secure pathway [20]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis: surgical management by posterior open-window focal debridement and joint fusion

Zhu

Jiang

Zhang

et al. 2017

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSacroiliac joint tuberculosis(SJT) is relatively uncommon, but it may cause severe sacroiliac joint destruction and functional disorder. Few studies in the literature have been presented on SJT, reports of surgical treatment for SJT are even fewer. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed surgical management of patients with severe SJT of 3 different types and proposed to reveal the clinical manifestations and features and aim to determine the efficiency and security of such surgical treatment.MethodsWe reviewed 17 patients with severe SJT of 3 different types who underwent posterior open-window focal debridement and bone graft for joint fusion. Among them,five patients with anterior sacral abscess had anterior abscess curettage before debridement. Two patients with lumbar vertebral tuberculosis received one-stage posterior tuberculous debridement, interbody fusion and instrumentation. Follow-up was performed 36 months (26 to 45 months) using the following parameters: erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), status of joint bony fusion on CT scan, visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).ResultsButtock pain and low back pain were progressively relieved with time. 6 months later, pain was not obvious, and ESR resumed to normal levels within 3 months. Solid fusion of the sacroiliac joint occurred within 12 months in all cases. No complications or recurrence occurred. At final follow-up, all patients had no pain or only minimal discomfort over the affected joint and almost complete functional recovery.ConclusionsPosterior open-window focal debridement and joint fusion is an efficient and secure surgical method to treat severe SJT. If there is an abscess in the front of the sacroiliac joint, anterior abscess curettage should be performed as a supplement.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-017-1866-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Zlomislic

Garfin

2019

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Untitled

Cited by 16 publications

References 3 publications

Clinical features and surgical management of tuberculous arthritis of the sacroiliac joint: a retrospective analysis of 33 patients

Clinical features and surgical management of tuberculous arthritis of the sacroiliac joint: a retrospective analysis of 33 patients

Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis: surgical management by posterior open-window focal debridement and joint fusion

Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About