2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.2972133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint 3D Trajectory Design and Time Allocation for UAV-Enabled Wireless Power Transfer Networks

Abstract: This paper considers a rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled wireless power transfer system, where a UAV is dispatched as an energy transmitter (ET), transferring radio frequency (RF) signals to a set of energy receivers (ERs) periodically. We aim to maximize the energy harvested at all ERs by jointly optimizing the UAV's three-dimensional (3D) placement, beam pattern and charging time. However, the considered optimization problem taking into account the drone flight altitude and the wireless cover… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We denote the 2D locations of the UAV by z u = (x u , y u ), and its altitude as h. The location of the device k ∈{1, 2, • • • K} on the ground are z k = (x k , y k ). Since UAVs can be flexibly deployed and moved in 3D place, we assume that the UAV-ground channel is line-of-sight (LoS)-dominated, and the channel h k between the UAV and device k is given by [22], [23]…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote the 2D locations of the UAV by z u = (x u , y u ), and its altitude as h. The location of the device k ∈{1, 2, • • • K} on the ground are z k = (x k , y k ). Since UAVs can be flexibly deployed and moved in 3D place, we assume that the UAV-ground channel is line-of-sight (LoS)-dominated, and the channel h k between the UAV and device k is given by [22], [23]…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 shows the optimal location that maximizes the sum-energy, and compares the energy received by individual sensors when the UAV hovering at the optimal location in Scheme 1 of 2D case. In this simulation, ten sensors with (1003, 13), (1008, 31), (1016, 11), (1018, 33), (1020, 23), (1022, 18), (1029, 19), (1055, 29), (1060, 27), (1065, 38) as 2D coordinates are used and we set V = 9 m/s. As seen from Fig.…”
Section: ) Case A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], the maximum network throughput was discussed in a UAV-enabled relaying system where the UAV receives both energy and information from a BS, and then forwards the information to the ground user. The authors in [19] studied the use of a rotary-wing UAV as an energy transmitter to charge a set of energy receivers (ERs) taking into account the UAV's flight altitude and coverage performance. The energy harvested by all ERs was maximized via jointly optimizing the UAV's placement, beam pattern and charging time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A max-min average rate optimization problem for an energy-constrained UAV-assisted downlink cellular network was studied in [29], in which a joint design of resource allocation and 3D trajectory was proposed. In [30], the authors considered a rotary-wing UAV-enabled wireless power transfer system, where the harvested energy at all energy receivers was maximized by jointly optimizing the UAV's 3D trajectory, beam pattern and charging time. Furthermore, in [31], the authors investigated a UAV-assisted cognitive communication network, where the average rate of the secondary receivers was maximized by jointly optimizing the UAV's 3D trajectory and power allocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%