2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Estimation of Camera Pose, Depth, Deblurring, and Super-Resolution from a Blurred Image Sequence

Abstract: The conventional methods for estimating camera poses and scene structures from severely blurry or low resolution images often result in failure. The off-the-shelf deblurring or super-resolution methods may show visually pleasing results. However, applying each technique independently before matching is generally unprofitable because this naïve series of procedures ignores the consistency between images. In this paper, we propose a pioneering unified framework that solves four problems simultaneously, namely, d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimization-based methods rely on the blur formation model to recover the latent sharp image by minimizing an energy function [2], [4], [16], [18], [28], [37], [42], e.g., using Gaussian [2], [16], [37] or Poisson [27], [31] likelihood functions in the context of maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) estimation. Depending on the number of input blurry images, additional terms can be formulated by warping the other image(s) to a reference image using either dense flow or by combining relative camera poses with dense depth maps [14], [22]. Due to the nonlinear and ill-posed (in the case of a single image) nature of the problem, prior information on either the motion blur kernel or the latent sharp image must be used to constrain the solution space [2], [4], [16], [16], [28], [37], [37].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization-based methods rely on the blur formation model to recover the latent sharp image by minimizing an energy function [2], [4], [16], [18], [28], [37], [42], e.g., using Gaussian [2], [16], [37] or Poisson [27], [31] likelihood functions in the context of maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) estimation. Depending on the number of input blurry images, additional terms can be formulated by warping the other image(s) to a reference image using either dense flow or by combining relative camera poses with dense depth maps [14], [22]. Due to the nonlinear and ill-posed (in the case of a single image) nature of the problem, prior information on either the motion blur kernel or the latent sharp image must be used to constrain the solution space [2], [4], [16], [16], [28], [37], [37].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], a new method is proposed to simultaneously estimate optical flow and tackle the case of general blur by minimization a single non-convex energy function. Park et al [33] estimate camera poses and scene structures from severely blurred images and deblurring by using the motion information.…”
Section: A Single View Deblurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches of [7,25] handle depth estimation with other vision tasks like segmentation and surface normal prediction. The work of [36], on the other hand, proposes a multi-task prediction and distillation network (PAD-Net) structure for joint depth estimation and scene parsing in aim to improve both tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%