2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3101805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Estimation of Satellite Attitude and Size Based on ISAR Image Interpretation and Parametric Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, key point extraction network (KPEN) is developed and a novel method for attitude determination via extracted key points is proposed thereafter [12] . Focused on the size and attitude information of satellite key component, pix2pix generative adversarial network is developed in [13] for ISAR image segmentation. A joint estimation method for satellite attitude and size is proposed and the superiority of which is validated on simulated dataset [13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, key point extraction network (KPEN) is developed and a novel method for attitude determination via extracted key points is proposed thereafter [12] . Focused on the size and attitude information of satellite key component, pix2pix generative adversarial network is developed in [13] for ISAR image segmentation. A joint estimation method for satellite attitude and size is proposed and the superiority of which is validated on simulated dataset [13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focused on the size and attitude information of satellite key component, pix2pix generative adversarial network is developed in [13] for ISAR image segmentation. A joint estimation method for satellite attitude and size is proposed and the superiority of which is validated on simulated dataset [13] . However, the above-mentioned methods ignore the scattering characteristics of ISAR images, the performances of which need to be further improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes conventional fusion imaging systems unstable in terms of image quality and does not guarantee consistent results from one fusion to the next, thus making them unreliable for practical applications. In addition, conventional fusion imaging systems are dependent on the quality of the image acquisition equipment as they involve the pre-processing and fusion of images, which not only results in unstable image quality, but also increases the operational workload of the system, thus affecting the imaging efficiency [3] . In addition, the conventional fusion imaging system lacks uniform processing of infrared images, resulting in the clarity and resolution of infrared images are not up to standard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%