Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Langua 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/n16-1033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Extraction of Events and Entities within a Document Context

Abstract: Events and entities are closely related; entities are often actors or participants in events and events without entities are uncommon. The interpretation of events and entities is highly contextually dependent. Existing work in information extraction typically models events separately from entities, and performs inference at the sentence level, ignoring the rest of the document. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that models the dependencies among variables of events, entities, and their relations, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
177
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
177
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the ACE data set lacks coreference annotations, we train on the coreference annotations from the OntoNotes dataset (Pradhan et al, 2012). For event extraction we use the split described in Yang and Mitchell (2016); Zhang et al (2019). We refer to this split as ACE05-E in what follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ACE data set lacks coreference annotations, we train on the coreference annotations from the OntoNotes dataset (Pradhan et al, 2012). For event extraction we use the split described in Yang and Mitchell (2016); Zhang et al (2019). We refer to this split as ACE05-E in what follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duan et al (2017) introduces a pretrained document embedding to aid event detection, but their extraction is still at the sentence level. Past work on cross-sentence extraction often relies on explicit coreference annotations or the assumption of a single event in the document (Wick et al, 2006;Gerber and Chai, 2010;Swampillai and Stevenson, 2011;Yoshikawa et al, 2011;Koch et al, 2014;Yang and Mitchell, 2016). Recently, there has been increasing interest in general cross-sentence relation extraction Peng et al, 2017;Wang and Poon, 2018), but their scope is still limited to short text spans of a few consecutive sentences.…”
Section: Document-level Relation Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented a state-of-the-art event detection system based on Yang and Mitchell (2016) to pinpoint words or phrases in a sentence that refer to events involving participants and locations, affected by other events and spatiotemporal aspects. The module is trained on the ACE 2005 data (Doddington et al 2004), consisting of 529 documents from a variety of sources.…”
Section: Monolingual and Cross-lingual Event Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%