2013
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint inversion of seismic and geodetic data for the source of the 2010 March 4, Mw 6.3 Jia-Shian, SW Taiwan, earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two moderate magnitude earthquakes, the 2010 M w 6.3 Jia‐Shian earthquake and the 2016 M w 6.4 Meinong earthquake, which epicenters were located ~50 and ~30 km east of Tainan Tableland, respectively (e.g. Ching, Johnson, et al, ; Huang et al, , Huang, Hsin, et al, ), nucleated at deeper depths of 15–25 km than the structures drawn in Figure c cross section. Both events had oblique reverse faulting focal mechanisms that show that the middle crust is also involved in shortening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two moderate magnitude earthquakes, the 2010 M w 6.3 Jia‐Shian earthquake and the 2016 M w 6.4 Meinong earthquake, which epicenters were located ~50 and ~30 km east of Tainan Tableland, respectively (e.g. Ching, Johnson, et al, ; Huang et al, , Huang, Hsin, et al, ), nucleated at deeper depths of 15–25 km than the structures drawn in Figure c cross section. Both events had oblique reverse faulting focal mechanisms that show that the middle crust is also involved in shortening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We apply a smoothing parameter between subfaults following Huang et al . [] to avoid model overfitting or underfitting, and we do not assign damping of slip at the edges of fault segments. This method depicts the smoothing by plotting the smoothing value versus variance reduction (VR) curve and then chooses the smoothing value when further decreasing smoothing does not significantly improve the fit variance reduction ( normalVnormalR=[]1i()disi2idi2×100, where d i is the observed data and s i is its prediction based on the model) (Figure a).…”
Section: Coseismic Fault Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used to simultaneously invert the seismic waveform, GPS, and InSAR geodetic data is based on the method of Hartzell and Heaton (1983), as implemented in Kaverina et al (2002) and Huang et al (2013). This approach assumes a constant rupture velocity and multiple time windows to account for some variation in rupture speed and the local rise time.…”
Section: Inversion Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%