2016
DOI: 10.1190/geo-2015-0272.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint inversion of source location and focal mechanism of microseismicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the polarity reversals existed in the waveforms, the moment tensors need to be determined to correct the polarities in order for the true event location (i.e., Zhebel and Eisner, 2015;Liang et al, 2016). The common approach is to estimate event location and moment tensors simultaneously by means of the global optimization methods, such as the grid search method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the polarity reversals existed in the waveforms, the moment tensors need to be determined to correct the polarities in order for the true event location (i.e., Zhebel and Eisner, 2015;Liang et al, 2016). The common approach is to estimate event location and moment tensors simultaneously by means of the global optimization methods, such as the grid search method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the diffraction stacking based methods, the problem of changing polarities (due to the radiation pattern of source mechanism) remains unavoidable. To overcome the destructive interference, the polarity is usually determined through estimating moment tensors before stacking Non-peer reviewed EarthArXiv preprint 6 (Anikiev et al, 2014;Zhebel and Eisner, 2015;Vlcek et al, 2016;Liang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They demonstrated a high quality of the source mechanisms even with a high level of noise in the data. Afterward, Liang et al () and Yu et al (2018) proposed a similar joint inversion strategy by extending the source‐scanning algorithm to the joint source‐scanning algorithm, which scans both locations and focal mechanism. They carried out a theoretical and numerical analysis of the feasibility of the new method and demonstrated its superior performance in robustness and efficiency with field data from surface microseismic monitoring in the Sichuan Basin.…”
Section: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microseismicity studies have been conducted in a wide range of fields for different purposes, such as the identification of fault plane (Kao & Shan, ; Mori & Hartzell, ); the detection of tectonic tremor, low frequency earthquakes and very low frequency earthquakes (Ito et al, ; Obara, ; Peng & Gomberg, ; Shelly, ; Shelly et al, ); the studies of seismicity before and after a large earthquake (Cesca et al, ; Kato et al, ; Nakamura et al, ; Tang et al, ; Yao et al, ); the monitoring of microseismic events induced by hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas industry (Eisner et al, ; Liang et al, ; Maxwell et al, ); and monitoring volcanic activity (Battaglia et al, ; Lengliné et al, ; Zhang & Wen, ). Two major aspects are essential in microseismicity study: identifying weak signals with a low signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and constraining locations of small events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of characteristic functions are chosen for SSA with a coherent aim of highlighting effective signals by stacking, for instance, the short‐time‐average to long‐time‐average ratio (Allen, ); absolute amplitude (Kao & Shan, ); energy envelope (Baker et al, ; Kao & Shan, ); and the kurtosis and its gradient (Langet et al, ). Liang et al () proposed a modified SSA to scan seismic locations and focal mechanisms simultaneously, termed the joint SSA. The match filter method applies full‐wave cross‐correlation (CC) between template events and continuous waveforms to select slave events, which also elevates SNRs by stacking CC functions over multiple stations and components (Gibbons et al, ; Gibbons & Ringdal, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%