2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint kinematics estimate using wearable inertial and magnetic sensing modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
192
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
192
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) its anatomical CSs are consistent with ISB recommendations; (2) its performances are widely tested and documented [1,2,8]; (3) it was the reference protocol used in [17]; (4) it requires the use of clusters of markers, which can be thought as SU, and the definition of technical frames, which are analog to the local CS of a SU. These features ease the simultaneous application of CAST and Outwalk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(1) its anatomical CSs are consistent with ISB recommendations; (2) its performances are widely tested and documented [1,2,8]; (3) it was the reference protocol used in [17]; (4) it requires the use of clusters of markers, which can be thought as SU, and the definition of technical frames, which are analog to the local CS of a SU. These features ease the simultaneous application of CAST and Outwalk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Picerno et al [84] calculated waveform similarity of joint angle kinematics using the mean absolute error of each waveform compared to the mean of all recorded waveforms:…”
Section: Mean Absolute Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, to meet the requirements of intra-and intersubject repeatability, the acquired data were represented relative to anatomical planes approximating the frontal, transverse, and sagittal anatomical plane. For this purpose, an anatomical calibration procedure was carried out that determines the orientation of such anatomical planes based on the identification, intrinsically repeatable, of selected anatomical landmarks (ALs) (Picerno et al 2008).…”
Section: Kinematics Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation of two non-parallel lines was determined with respect to the sensor technical reference frame (TF) by identifying lines connecting couple of ALs with a calibration device, equipped with two mobile pointers and carrying a MARG sensor, an active axis of which was aligned with the line joining the two pointers and, thus, joining the ALs. These non-parallel lined were used to determine the orthogonal axes of each anatomical frame (AF) through given geometric rules (Picerno et al 2008). To minimize problems related to ferro-magnetic disturbances, experiments were conducted in a controlled magnetic field environment.…”
Section: Kinematics Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%