2017
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2016.2639017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Mode Selection and Interference Management in Device-to-Device Communications Underlaid MIMO Cellular Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widely deployed cellular network, assisted with device-to-device (D2D) communications, can provide a promising solution to support V2V communications. There have been different considerable works that have been presented to explore mode selection and resource optimization in direct D2D communications taking into account the interference situation [11][12][13] when sharing the radio resources and the quality of the links for both cellular and D2D links [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In [11], joint mode selection, channel assignment, and power control in D2D communications are investigated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely deployed cellular network, assisted with device-to-device (D2D) communications, can provide a promising solution to support V2V communications. There have been different considerable works that have been presented to explore mode selection and resource optimization in direct D2D communications taking into account the interference situation [11][12][13] when sharing the radio resources and the quality of the links for both cellular and D2D links [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In [11], joint mode selection, channel assignment, and power control in D2D communications are investigated.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper by [6], the authors used linear interference alignment techniques in order to solve the joint D2D mode selection and mitigate interference, likewise in [7] they maximized the mean throughput of the system and minimized the average delay by using queuing and decision process model. In 2017 [8], the authors proposed a graph theory-based solution using concatenated bi-partite matching (CBM) method in order to enhance the overall performance of D2D in the overall network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Allocation of the resources to individual D2D pairs in the shared region maximizing C s . This is done by allocation of the RBs to the D2D pairs with the highest transmission efficiency according to (8). 5) Allocation of the default amount of RBs (n i d ) in the dedicated region to each D2D pair, where the default number of the RBs allocated to the i-th D2D pair n i d is calculated as:…”
Section: ) Determination If Individual D2d Pairs Can Reuse the Rbs Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) The eNB determines that the D2D pair 1 and 2 are mutual neighbors (i.e., orthogonal RBs have to be allocated to them in the shared region), while the D2D pair 4 has no neighbors that are able to reuse the RBs of the CUE 2. 4) According to (8), the eNB allocates all RBs assigned to the CUE 1 to the D2D pair 1 since the D2D pair 1 has higher transmission efficiency at these RBs than the D2D pair 2. Contrary, the D2D pair 2 reuses all RBs allocated to the CUE 3 as it experiences higher transmission efficiency at these RBs than the D2D pair 1.…”
Section: ) Determination If Individual D2d Pairs Can Reuse the Rbs Amentioning
confidence: 99%