2007
DOI: 10.1243/1748006xjrr31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint modelling and optimization of monitoring and maintenance performance for a two-unit parallel system

Abstract: This paper proposes a new methodology for optimizing maintenance and monitoring performance. The performance of the monitoring device is modelled classically by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. From a practical point of view, this approach leads to a very simple optimization scheme in which the optimal monitoring technology or structure can be chosen among a finite set of possible ones, on the basis of their impact on the maintenance performance and their own cost. At the same time, the maintena… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, considering that measurement errors are inevitable in practice, an inspection can be imperfect in two ways [28]: a false positive (FP) occurs when the inspection reveals that maintenance is needed while in fact it is not, and a false negative (FN) occurs when the inspection reveals that maintenance is not needed while in fact it is. These two imperfect inspection results will lead to additional cost due to premature maintenance activity or unrevealed risk for future operation [29], and the performance of such a condition-based maintenance policy could be worse than that of a "blind" time-based preventive maintenance [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, considering that measurement errors are inevitable in practice, an inspection can be imperfect in two ways [28]: a false positive (FP) occurs when the inspection reveals that maintenance is needed while in fact it is not, and a false negative (FN) occurs when the inspection reveals that maintenance is not needed while in fact it is. These two imperfect inspection results will lead to additional cost due to premature maintenance activity or unrevealed risk for future operation [29], and the performance of such a condition-based maintenance policy could be worse than that of a "blind" time-based preventive maintenance [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barros et al 12 studied the optimal maintenance policy of a two-component parallel system based on imperfect monitoring information. Barros et al 13 proposed a new methodology for optimizing maintenance and monitoring the performance for a two-unit parallel system. Nourelfath and Chatelet 14 considered the PM and tactical production planning for a parallel system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, a structure's health has been monitored using the electrical or magnetic impedance method (Giurgiutiu et al 4 ), low frequency vibrations (Friswell and Penny 5 ), and transmittance function monitoring (Zhang et al 6 ), to name a few. Barros et al 7 developed a simple optimization scheme to choose the optimal maintenance technology for a given structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%