2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2016.2564989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint MR-PET Reconstruction Using a Multi-Channel Image Regularizer

Abstract: While current state of the art MR-PET scanners enable simultaneous MR and PET measurements, the acquired data sets are still usually reconstructed separately. We propose a new multi-modality reconstruction framework using second order Total Generalized Variation (TGV) as a dedicated multi-channel regularization functional that jointly reconstructs images from both modalities. In this way, information about the underlying anatomy is shared during the image reconstruction process while unique differences are pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, the optimization problem of joint MR-PET image reconstruction can be written as (Ehrhardt et al, 2015;Knoll et al, 2016;Mehranian et al, 2018;Sudarshan, Chen, & Awate, 2018): …”
Section: Recent Developments In Mr-pet Image Reconstruction 341 |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, the optimization problem of joint MR-PET image reconstruction can be written as (Ehrhardt et al, 2015;Knoll et al, 2016;Mehranian et al, 2018;Sudarshan, Chen, & Awate, 2018): …”
Section: Recent Developments In Mr-pet Image Reconstruction 341 |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compared our method with the joint TGV method using the phantom and software publicly provided by Ref. . The results presented in Supporting Information Figure show that both synergistic methods perform similarly for modality‐shared edges but differently for modality‐unique lesions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of computational complexity compared to previous methods, the added computational load of our algorithm is not substantial because there is no need for optimization with respect to primal and dual variables as used in Ref. ; and there is no optimization of an augmented Lagrangian problem as used in Ref. .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is general enough to solve the optimization problem with other priors such as the directional total variation / parallel level sets, 45, 46 total generalized variation (TGV), [47][48][49] directional TGV 50 or structure tensor-based total variation 51 to name a few. In addition to PET reconstruction, SPDHG may help easing the computational effort in multi-modal medical imaging as well, where the PDHG has been used to jointly reconstruct from simultaneously acquired PET-MRI data with a nuclear norm variant of TGV 52 or coupled Bregman iterations. 53 Similarly, a comparable speed up is expected in other imaging modalities that involve line integrals like computerized tomography (CT) where PDHG also found its applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%