2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint multi-label classification and label correlations with missing labels and feature selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To effectively evaluate the classification results of all compared feature selection algorithms, six evaluation metrics are employed, which include the number of selected features (N ), the Average Precision (AP), the Coverage (CV), the Hamming Loss (HL), the One Error (OE), and the Ranking Loss (RL) [43], [44]. The larger the value of AP is, the better the classification performance is, and the optimal value is 1.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysis A Experiments Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively evaluate the classification results of all compared feature selection algorithms, six evaluation metrics are employed, which include the number of selected features (N ), the Average Precision (AP), the Coverage (CV), the Hamming Loss (HL), the One Error (OE), and the Ranking Loss (RL) [43], [44]. The larger the value of AP is, the better the classification performance is, and the optimal value is 1.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysis A Experiments Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semisupervised multilabel method is proposed in [ 23 ], while label correlations are incorporated by modifying the loss function. Multilabel classification and label correlations learning can also be realized in a joint learning framework [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label-specific feature learning [9], [16], [20], [29]- [31] aims to improve the performance of multi-label classification by learning a discriminative data representation for each label respectively. Multi-label learning with missing labels solve the problem that some entities are missing in the label matrix [8], [32]- [38]. By surveying previous success on multi-label learning, it is noted that existing approaches mainly focused on a fixed set of observed labels.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%