2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icdcs.2017.232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Optimization of Chain Placement and Request Scheduling for Network Function Virtualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the authors in [11] assumed that each physical link has a particular delay which is not completely true. A similar assumption of loss rate can be found in [14]. In fact, latency and traffic traversing through the link have a non-linear relation [15].…”
Section: A Mathematical Optimisation-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For instance, the authors in [11] assumed that each physical link has a particular delay which is not completely true. A similar assumption of loss rate can be found in [14]. In fact, latency and traffic traversing through the link have a non-linear relation [15].…”
Section: A Mathematical Optimisation-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…To ensure those priorities, function deployment plays one of the most important roles in this architecture. We know from existing researches [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] that different network function deployment schemes have a significant impact on traffic processing performance as well as cost of system resources and under the constraint of resources, the optimal function deployment to meet all SFCs is very complicated and difficult.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for our knowledge, there exists no architecture like ours that not only could provide data plane of switch with flexible and customized network functions, but also could implement management of network functions and packet scheduling from level of architecture. Other existing researches only solve sub-problems [5][6][7][8]. In this paper, Firstly, we design RPSA architecture, which solves the problem of poor scalability and flexibility of switch by attaching NFV technology to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service requirements in NFV are characterized by network flows, and the packets need to pass through the ordered set of VNFs before reaching the destination. Such specific order is studied as the so-called Service Function Chain (SFC) in the NFV literature (see [12], [18], [19]). Vast works on NFV are done under the SFC constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%