2016
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2016.2536019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Optimization of Task Scheduling and Image Placement in Fog Computing Supported Software-Defined Embedded System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
159
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
159
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 Besides, there are some early works that try to deal with task scheduling problem regarding fog computing. Zeng et al 28 target at minimizing the task completion time while providing a better user experience by designing an efficient resource management strategy in a fog computing supported software-defined embedded system. Meanwhile, Nan et al 29 consider a three-tier cloud of things (CoT) system and design an adaptive decision-making algorithm called unit-slot optimization for distributing the incoming data to the corresponding tiers that can provide cost-effective processing while guaranteeing average response time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Besides, there are some early works that try to deal with task scheduling problem regarding fog computing. Zeng et al 28 target at minimizing the task completion time while providing a better user experience by designing an efficient resource management strategy in a fog computing supported software-defined embedded system. Meanwhile, Nan et al 29 consider a three-tier cloud of things (CoT) system and design an adaptive decision-making algorithm called unit-slot optimization for distributing the incoming data to the corresponding tiers that can provide cost-effective processing while guaranteeing average response time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the costs for fog resources should have been compared to cloud resources as these resources were also shared by multiple clients. Zeng [2] proposed a joint optimization of task scheduling and image placement in fog computing supported software-defined network embedded system. Computational resources were provided from two sources: embedded clients and fog nodes represented by computation servers.…”
Section: B On Effects Of Computation Service Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, heavy computation tasks still need to be processed at a remote cloud due to the limitation of fog's resources. Research on computation offloading has been explored on methods and in frameworks over the last few years [1][2][3]. These approaches showed that processing requests at local fog platforms results in faster response times in general compared to handling them at centralized clouds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to cloud computing networks, F‐RANs shorten the transmission distance and reduce the network latency by colocating core network functions and localized mobile data content . The scalability and flexibility of F‐RANs can be increased by coordinating the technologies used in the air interface, network architecture, and core network . With these advantages, F‐RAN architectures have been selected for use in the forthcoming 5G network system .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%