2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2011.00320.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Private Safety Standards and Vertical Relationships in Food Retailing

Abstract: In recent years, it has become common for downstream firms to impose Joint Private Standards (JPSs) on upstream producers. In this paper, we present an original model of a vertical relationship, explaining the incentives for and the effects of such JPSs with an example concerning food safety. The risk of a food crisis is endogenously determined. Using the concept of cartel stability (d'Aspremont et al., 1983), it is shown that liability rules are crucial for JPSs to emerge, that a JPS can become a minimum qual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 'liability function' is then performed in the sense that standards provide additional security vis-à -vis the threat of civil legal actions against a firm producing unsafe food (and the resulting financial damages) (Hobbs 2004). Hence, liability rules are shown to be crucial for these standards to emerge and the risk of a market sanction (fall in demand in the case of a sanitary accident) is not always sufficient to favour the emergence of such initiatives (see Giraud-Héraud et al 2012a). Other authors argue that private standards afford "domain defense" (Caswell and Johnson 1991) and protect market share and reputation (Fulponi 2006).…”
Section: Private Standards and Risk Management In Agrifood Chainsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 'liability function' is then performed in the sense that standards provide additional security vis-à -vis the threat of civil legal actions against a firm producing unsafe food (and the resulting financial damages) (Hobbs 2004). Hence, liability rules are shown to be crucial for these standards to emerge and the risk of a market sanction (fall in demand in the case of a sanitary accident) is not always sufficient to favour the emergence of such initiatives (see Giraud-Héraud et al 2012a). Other authors argue that private standards afford "domain defense" (Caswell and Johnson 1991) and protect market share and reputation (Fulponi 2006).…”
Section: Private Standards and Risk Management In Agrifood Chainsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The coexistence of cooperation and non-cooperation is very complex to represent formally. In order to adequately model the specificities of the applied context, the paper by Giraud-Héraud et al (2012a) combines models of Industrial Economics (vertical relationships and product differentiation) and the concepts of the stability of coalitions (Bloch 1995). Giraud-Héraud et al (2012a) model the development of a private standard as a process leading to the creation of a second spot market starting from an initial configuration, where only one intermediary spot market exists (see Fig.…”
Section: Exploring the Rationale For Collective Normalization Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to adequately model the specificities of the applied context, the paper by Giraud-Héraud et al (2012a) combines models of Industrial Economics (vertical relationships and product differentiation) and the concepts of the stability of coalitions (Bloch 1995). Giraud-Héraud et al (2012a) model the development of a private standard as a process leading to the creation of a second spot market starting from an initial configuration, where only one intermediary spot market exists (see Fig. 5.2a with n ¼ R).…”
Section: Exploring the Rationale For Collective Normalization Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its collaborative approach brings together international food safety experts from the entire supply chain at Technical Working Group and Stakeholder meetings, conferences and regional events. They share knowledge and promote a harmonized approach with a shared vision of "safe food for consumers everywhere" [12].…”
Section: Developments In Food Safety Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%