2018
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2017.2777476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Sensing Duration Adaptation, User Matching, and Power Allocation for Cognitive OFDM-NOMA Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…h a B h b K h a (7) In formula (7), b i,k is the power allocation factor of the k th user in the user cluster C i in the orthogonal multiple access mode. Then, the users in the user cluster C i need to be clustered again according to the above method until the sum of the throughputs of the users in the single user cluster is greater than the sum of the throughputs of the users in the orthogonal multiple access.…”
Section: Improved Clustering Scheme Based On User Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…h a B h b K h a (7) In formula (7), b i,k is the power allocation factor of the k th user in the user cluster C i in the orthogonal multiple access mode. Then, the users in the user cluster C i need to be clustered again according to the above method until the sum of the throughputs of the users in the single user cluster is greater than the sum of the throughputs of the users in the orthogonal multiple access.…”
Section: Improved Clustering Scheme Based On User Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NOMA system, multiple users perform power multiplexing at the transmitting end and share the same subchannel, which form a user cluster. Therefore, the choice of user clustering [6] and power allocation [7] schemes will have a large impact on system performance. User pairing and power allocation are discussed in [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is assigning users one by one according to their preference lists ("User Preference") [19]. The other is grouping users by Gale-Shapley algorithm("Gale-Shapley") [18]. In the simulations, the number of users is set to an integer multiple of the number of groups.…”
Section: B Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also exist some user grouping strategies based on the maching theory or matching game [15], where the set of users and channels were considered as two sets of players [16]- [19]. The authors in [18] proposed a suboptimal algorithm based on matching theory to maximize the system capacity in half-duplex cognitive OFDM-NOMA systems. In [19], users were assigned one by one based on matching game to maximize the weighted total sum-rate with consideration of user fairness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) technique was explored in [7] to improve the throughput of the networks. Throughput-optimal problem of nodes scheduling for NOMA was tackled in [8] for a multi-carrier network. Considering the fairness between different nodes, the work in [9] investigated a fair opportunistic scheduler based on probabilistic scheduling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%