2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint tomography of multi-cross-hole and borehole-to-surface seismic data for karst detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution tomography process is strongly in uenced by the illumination of the wave's rays that pass through an area. (Marti et al, 2002; Wang and Rao 2006; Peng et al, 2021), In this research, we conducted specialized design acquisition targeting ray density of more than ten rays that passed through the cells around the main target area Lembang Fault, so it is a su cient number of wave rays in each cell (2 km) which is could well illuminate the geometry of the Lembang Fault with a fairly high resolution. Due to the limited recording instruments available (15 seismometer), to cover 40 X 20 km survey area with resolution 2 km is need special approach to get higher than 10 rays for every cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution tomography process is strongly in uenced by the illumination of the wave's rays that pass through an area. (Marti et al, 2002; Wang and Rao 2006; Peng et al, 2021), In this research, we conducted specialized design acquisition targeting ray density of more than ten rays that passed through the cells around the main target area Lembang Fault, so it is a su cient number of wave rays in each cell (2 km) which is could well illuminate the geometry of the Lembang Fault with a fairly high resolution. Due to the limited recording instruments available (15 seismometer), to cover 40 X 20 km survey area with resolution 2 km is need special approach to get higher than 10 rays for every cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface seismic methods are suitable for near-surface conditions; however, they face challenges in transmitting sufficient energy through the weathered zone to desired depths due to the strong attenuation of seismic waves in unsaturated, unconsolidated sediments [1][2][3]. The cross-hole seismic imaging method has gained wide utilization in geotechnical engineering parameter calculation [4], tunnel and cavity detection [5][6][7], hydrogeology surveys [8][9][10], rock and aquifer distribution detection [11][12][13], reservoir descriptions [14][15][16], rock fragmentation descriptions [17], civil engineering [18], detection of hydrocarbon reservoirs [19][20][21] and so on. Despite this, this method also has deficiencies; for example, when cross-hole seismic receivers are arranged near the target body, the wavefield in profile between two wells is greatly influenced due to the medium inhomogeneity (especially the high-velocity target) in 3D space, leading to image distortion [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-hole tomography has been used in mining exploration (Wong, 2000), aquifer delineation, and hydrology-related topics (Hubbard and Rubin, 2000;Daley et al, 2004;Dietrich and Tronicke, 2009;Linder et al, 2010;von Ketelhodt et al, 2018). It has also been used to characterise a host rock and its smallscale structures such as fault planes (Maurer and Green, 1997;Rumpf and Tronicke, 2014;Doetsch et al, 2020;Shakas et al, 2020) and to investigate pore pressure variations in aquifers and caprocks (Daley et al, 2008;Marchesini et al, 2017;Grab et al, 2022) as well as voids in karst regions (Duan et al, 2017;Kulich and Bleibinhaus, 2020;Peng et al, 2021). Furthermore, Gusmeroli et al (2010) and Axtell et al (2016) used GPR-based travel-time tomography to estimate the water content in a polythermal glacier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%