2000
DOI: 10.1163/182539100x00777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JOLANDE JACOBI, La psicologia di C. G. Jung, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 1997, 238 pp.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a further consequence of the close identification between the founder and the company, in this case study the father has a marginal role in the family dynamics, unlike that which has been highlighted in the literature on family business (Jennings et al, 2013). As suggested by the family literature, this case study shows that the exclusion of the father from the dynamics of power in the long term can generate imbalance between affective/care needs and ethical/responsibility issues (Scabini, 1995;Yaffe, 2020), hence generating dysfunctional patterns in the next generation (Erickson, 2015;Pakaluk and Price, 2020). This study shows that the prevalence of the affective/care over the ethical/responsibility dimension in the long term can generate a so-called enmeshed family (Olson, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a further consequence of the close identification between the founder and the company, in this case study the father has a marginal role in the family dynamics, unlike that which has been highlighted in the literature on family business (Jennings et al, 2013). As suggested by the family literature, this case study shows that the exclusion of the father from the dynamics of power in the long term can generate imbalance between affective/care needs and ethical/responsibility issues (Scabini, 1995;Yaffe, 2020), hence generating dysfunctional patterns in the next generation (Erickson, 2015;Pakaluk and Price, 2020). This study shows that the prevalence of the affective/care over the ethical/responsibility dimension in the long term can generate a so-called enmeshed family (Olson, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In addition, this protective environment can, at the same time, start to be perceived as a trap (a "golden cage") in the long-term, due to the rigidity of the role system. Once more, in the absence of an ethical dimension provided by the father, the affective/care dimension prevails with further specific long-term consequences for the next generation (for a recent review see Fiese, 2018, and here cited literature; see also Parke, 2002Parke, , 2004Scabini, 1995). Leibowitz (1986) observed that, for the next generation, the decision to join the family business is often understood as a successful attempt to solve long-standing family problems that may not otherwise be easily resolved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These aggregations are phenomena that are difficult to define or replicate from an economic perspective [1]. This has been an often-treated topic in the literature, where scholars have contributed to explaining the success factors, limits, and nature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Productive specialization, division of labour, and exploitation of economies of scale are some of the factors that best qualify this development model [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O embasamento desta consideração, por sua vez, é a reflexão já proposta por Robert Putnam (1993) Além disso, existem inúmeros estudos qualitativos, quantitativos e elaborações estatísticas que combinam, de formas diferentes, índices altos de networking, capacidade inovadora regional (social capability, knowledge spillover etc.) e presença de atitudes culturais (nem sempre bem definidas) com taxas altas de capital social, de desenvolvimento e valores crescentes de PIB regional (RIZZI, 2003;ABRAMOVITZ, 1995;STIGLITZ, 1995;HO KOO e PERKINS, 1995;BECATTINI, 2000aBECATTINI, , 2000bBECATTINI et al, 2001;CAMAGNI, 1991;CAMAGNI e CAPELLO, 2002;BAGNASCO et al, 2001;SESSA, 1998;ZAMAGNI, 1997, entre outros). A diferença entre eles está, substancialmente, na ênfase colocada, primariamente, nos aspectos de matriz sociocultural ou, pelo contrário, na prioridade atribuída às estruturas materiais e institucionais.…”
Section: )unclassified