2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.82.134516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Josephson current in ballistic superconductor-graphene systems

Abstract: We calculate the phase, the temperature and the junction length dependence of the supercurrent for ballistic graphene Josephson junctions. For low temperatures we find nonsinusoidal dependence of the supercurrent on the superconductor phase difference for both short and long junctions. The skewness, which characterizes the deviaton of the current-phase relation from a simple sinusoidal one, shows a linear dependence on the critical current for small currents. We discuss the similarities and differences with re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
51
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this low-density regime at the close vicinity of the Dirac point, lower temperatures is required to accurately measured supercurrent. Compared with the theoretical predictions on ideal-wide ballistic Josephson weak links 2,9 , where I c R N $ 2:44 D e , the value of the I c R N product obtained from our measurements, $ 1 3 D e , is much smaller. Such discrepancy may be attributed to the imperfect graphene-superconductor interface, and the relatively high-measurement temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this low-density regime at the close vicinity of the Dirac point, lower temperatures is required to accurately measured supercurrent. Compared with the theoretical predictions on ideal-wide ballistic Josephson weak links 2,9 , where I c R N $ 2:44 D e , the value of the I c R N product obtained from our measurements, $ 1 3 D e , is much smaller. Such discrepancy may be attributed to the imperfect graphene-superconductor interface, and the relatively high-measurement temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In a current driven Josephson weak link, the RCSJ can be described by equation: 2 , where I is the driving current, f the phase difference between the two superconducting contacts, R the normal state resistance, C the junction capacitance and I c the intrinsic Josephson current. Here we used the approximation that the current-phase relation is sinusoidal, while in the actual devices the current-phase relation is skewed 9,25,26 . Such sinusoidal ARTICLE approximation is justified since the error is smaller than B5% (see Supplementary Note 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, at higher temperatures the superconducting gap will be suppressed; we approximate the temperature dependence of the gap as ∆(T ) ≈ ∆ 0 1 − ( T T C ) 2 , where ∆ 0 is the gap for T → 0, and T C is the critical temperature [8,29,30]. Taking the complete temperaturedependent expression, we fit I C (T ) for Junction A using the value ∆ 0 = 1.2 meV extracted from multiple Andreev reflections measurements.…”
Section: Oct 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29]). In our case, ξ ≈ 550 nm, which explains the suppressed δE in the intermediate regime (Junctions B, E).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%