Journal ratings: a paper affiliation methodology

Docampo, Domingo; Safón, Vicente

doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04045-3

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The basis of our PAI lies in the individual decisions of the researchers, who choose where to submit their papers, and the editorial decisions of the journals, which decide what to publish (Docampo and Saf on, 2021). Our method does not ask experts directly through surveys, as the ASA methodology does, nor does it use rankings developed by other experts, as some mixed methods do (e.g.…”

Section: Finance Journal Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finance journal rankings: a paper affiliation methodology

Docampo

Safón

2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeIn this paper, the authors use a new methodology, called paper affiliation index, to create finance journal ranking using expert judgment and research impact, both of which are based on secondary, objective measures, thus making it possible to produce lists every year without human manipulation at virtually no cost.Design/methodology/approachBibliometrics. Python implementation.FindingsA new ranking with 65 finance journals.Research limitations/implicationsThis procedure helps to reduce bias and to deal with known problems associated with current methodologies. The data used in the methodology comes from public sources; the procedure is therefore easily replicable. This methodology is not subject-dependent and thus can be transferred to other realms of knowledge. Once the bibliometric institutional data has been gathered, the procedure is not computationally costly: a Python implementation of the algorithm executes the whole computation in a few seconds. Results seem to correct the pernicious Matthew effect which is so evident in citation-based methods.Originality/valueThe institutional classification created includes all institutions that have contributed papers to the field of finance. The procedure helps to reduce bias and to deal with known problems associated with current methodologies. The data used in the methodology comes from public sources, the procedure is therefore easily replicable. The methodology is not subject-dependent and thus can be transferred to other realms of knowledge. Once the bibliometric institutional data has been gathered, the procedure is not computationally costly.

show abstract

Section: Finance Journal Rankingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finance journal rankings: a paper affiliation methodology

Docampo

Safón

2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Even though its main measurement of journal impact factor (journal citation reports -JCR) is a subject of debate in the literature, Web of Science has been used as a data source for diverse bibliometric studies (Archambault & Larivière, 2009;Bensman, 2012;Buela-Casal & Zych, 2012;Carvalho et al, 2017;Carvalho, Sokulski et al, 2020;Garfield, 2006;Li et al, 2018;Vanclay, 2012). Along with Scopus, Web of Science bibliometric indicators have been used to support diverse hybrid journal classification lists (Docampo & Safón, 2021), especially in business management, such as the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC, 2019), and the Academic Journal Guide (AJG) by the Chartered Association of Business Schools (ABS, 2021), besides national classifications lists for all subject areas such as the updated Brazilian Qualis, which employs mainly percentiles (CAPES, 2019;Costa et al, 2020). Particularly on Business Management and the AJG-2021 list (ABS, 2021), it is worth noting that 1,423 out of all 1,698 listed journals (83.8%) are indexed in the Web of Science database, in which the majority of top classified journals are also indexed (100% of categories 4* and 4, and 97.4% of category 3).…”

Section: Bibliographic Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation and Management in MSMEs: A Literature Review of Highly Cited Papers

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) play a large role in different economies; hence the relevance of research on the factors that may leverage MSMEs competitiveness such as innovation and management. This research aims to review highly cited articles in the Web of Science database regarding management and/or innovation in the context of MSMEs. Besides showing MSMEs classifications across regions, this review also showed that variables employed in the highly cited papers have correspondences with excellence/quality management factors and traditional innovation types, which hence still serve as theoretical frameworks for research on MSMEs competitiveness. Moreover, theoretical relations were identified among all variables, being the strongest among networks-open innovation, information-knowledge, and product and process innovations. The results indicated that MSMEs competitiveness is related to sustainability, information-knowledge, and networks-open innovation; hence MSMEs managers and owners should pay attention to these factors. Finally, future research directions were also gathered and discussed.

show abstract

“…indexed journal, or high-ranked journal are some qualifications pursued by the journal managers and publisher institutions. Docampo & Safón [1] agree that journal rating is a crucial factor to be chosen by authors when submitting their work. In today's advanced world, reputation must be recognized and compete with others [2].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Why Must Journals at the University Level be Well Managed to Support the Era of University Independence?

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific journals have a vital role, from developing and disseminating science and technology to becoming a source of income generating for universities. Semarang State University has 166 journals, both National and Scientific Journals, spread across all faculties, study programs, institutions, and postgraduate programs. Many journals demand a good governance system characterized by a comprehensive service system. These procedures ensure consistent implementation and clear division of roles, so that journal management is carried out consistently, accountable, transparently, and professionally. This study aims to compile the main indicators of core services that must exist in journal management units at universities to support improving the performance of university journals that are consistent, accountable, transparent, professional, and able to capture future business opportunities. This type of research uses Participatory Action Research. The sampling technique is purposive sampling, and qualitative data is analyzed using content analysis. The study results found that the management of professional journals that have an orientation to business development at the university level requires a minimum of 10 key roles with 12 minimum service systems that must be developed. From these results, the next step is to develop an adequate information system outside of OJS to improve the performance of managers and services.

show abstract

Journal ratings: a paper affiliation methodology

Cited by 7 publications

References 67 publications

Finance journal rankings: a paper affiliation methodology

Finance journal rankings: a paper affiliation methodology

Innovation and Management in MSMEs: A Literature Review of Highly Cited Papers

Why Must Journals at the University Level be Well Managed to Support the Era of University Independence?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About