2019
DOI: 10.15388/kalbotyra.2019.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juk and gi, and “particles” in contemporary Lithuanian: Explaining language-particular elements in a cross-linguistic context

Abstract: In this paper, I propose to take a fresh look at the elements traditionally termed “particles” in descriptions of Lithuanian. I establish criteria that would allow one to come up with a meaningful classification of such elements, and argue for the descriptive language particular category of “sentence particles”. I then turn to the syntax and functions of juk and gi, two prominent elements of this category. In order to understand their functions better, I invoke cross-linguistic comparison. I demonstrate that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The place of mat in the structure of Lithuanian As shown in Panov (2019), the traditional classification of discourse-structuring devices of Lithuanian, such as the one provided in Ambrazas (2006), is not based upon a consistently applied clear set of criteria, and hence should be revised.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The place of mat in the structure of Lithuanian As shown in Panov (2019), the traditional classification of discourse-structuring devices of Lithuanian, such as the one provided in Ambrazas (2006), is not based upon a consistently applied clear set of criteria, and hence should be revised.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%