2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jump activity analysis for affine jump-diffusion models: Evidence from the commodity market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copula models have been widely used to describe the dependence between financial markets (e.g., Fonseca and Ignatieva, 2019 ; Fenech and Vosgha, 2019 ; Ouyang and Zhang, 2020 ). With a copula model, any multivariate distribution can be estimated by separately estimating the marginal distributions and the copula function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copula models have been widely used to describe the dependence between financial markets (e.g., Fonseca and Ignatieva, 2019 ; Fenech and Vosgha, 2019 ; Ouyang and Zhang, 2020 ). With a copula model, any multivariate distribution can be estimated by separately estimating the marginal distributions and the copula function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we consider three typical models. The first model is the stochastic volatility model with contemporaneous jumps in returns and volatility (SVCJ), which is the most popular affine model in the literature, for example, Bakshi, Cao, and Chen (1997); Broadie, Chernov, and Johannes (2007); Da Fonseca and Ignatieva (2019); Duan and Yeh (2010); Eraker (2004); Eraker, Johannes, and Polson (2003); Kaeck, Rodrigues, and Seeger (2017); Lin and Chang (2010); Neuberger (2012); Neumann, Prokopczuk, and Simen (2016); Ruan and Zhang (2018); Zhu and Lian (2011, 2012); and others. Bakshi et al (1997), Broadie et al (2007), Eraker (2004), and Neumann et al (2016) document that the SVCJ model is good enough to fit options and returns data simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Todorov and Tauchen (2011) investigated the properties of jump occurrences in the S&P500/VIX index for the period from September 22, 2003 to December 31, 2008, and found that jumps in the volatility and price level in most cases occur together; however, Podolskij and Ziggel (2010) showed that intraday jumps in the S&P500 E‐mini futures and VIX futures for the period from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2014, are low‐probability, high‐impact events, and cojumps between the return and volatility are relatively frequent events. Da Fonseca and Ignatieva (2019) investigated jump activity in the S&P500/VIX index, commodity markets, and equity markets for the period from July 15, 2008 to November 18, 2015, and found that the return and volatility do not jump together. As an emerging financial market, the development of China's financial market in recent decades has aroused extensive research interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%