2018
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcy118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Just Knowledge’: Can Social Work’s ‘Guilty Knowledge’ Help Build a More Inclusive Knowledge Society?

Abstract: In contemporary societies, the value and importance of knowledge is increasingly tied to its potential to generate profit. This raises questions about whether and how knowledge can, at the same time, be harnessed and valued for its capacity to advance social justice. In this paper we consider these questions in relation to social work knowledge and academic research utilisation, setting our analysis in the context of broader debates on these themes. As well as highlighting the risks that the 'knowledge economy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings confirm previous studies that document the numerous obstacles that stand in the way of developing and managing knowledge in the social services and, more generally, in the field of social work. These include an organizational atmosphere that demands reactive work as the norm, sparse opportunities for peer learning, and an organizational structure that impedes the institutionalization of knowledge management (Heinsch & Cribb, 2019;Qingnian & Yujie, 2005). Our study shows an organizational atmosphere of perpetual emergency and poor access to professional communities intended for discussing the poverty issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Findings confirm previous studies that document the numerous obstacles that stand in the way of developing and managing knowledge in the social services and, more generally, in the field of social work. These include an organizational atmosphere that demands reactive work as the norm, sparse opportunities for peer learning, and an organizational structure that impedes the institutionalization of knowledge management (Heinsch & Cribb, 2019;Qingnian & Yujie, 2005). Our study shows an organizational atmosphere of perpetual emergency and poor access to professional communities intended for discussing the poverty issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%