2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Justice in Teams: Antecedents and Consequences of Procedural Justice Climate

Abstract: This study examined antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate (Mossholder, Bennett, & Martin, 1998; Naumann & Bennett, 2000) in a sample of manufacturing teams. The results showed that climate level (i.e., the average procedural justice perception within the team) was significantly related to both team performance and team absenteeism. Moreover, the effects of climate level were moderated by climate strength, such that the relationships were more beneficial in stronger climates. In addition, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
626
0
21

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 559 publications
(670 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
23
626
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the context of studying turnover rates, as we do here, equivalent amounts of turnover (e.g., losing 25% of the work unit) may create greater challenges for larger units. Group size is associated with numerous process inefficiencies, including coordination and motivation losses, less social interaction and participation among members, lower quality relationships between supervisors and subordinates, lower satisfaction and commitment, lower collectivism, and higher absenteeism (Colquitt, Noe, & Jackson, 2002;Green et al, 1996;Hare, 1981;Kozlowski & Bell, 2003;LePine & Van Dyne, 1998;Markham, Dansereau, & Alutto, 1982). These process inefficiencies appear likely to inhibit the ability to manage the competing socialization and customer service demands brought on by turnover.…”
Section: Voluntary Turnover Rates and Service Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the context of studying turnover rates, as we do here, equivalent amounts of turnover (e.g., losing 25% of the work unit) may create greater challenges for larger units. Group size is associated with numerous process inefficiencies, including coordination and motivation losses, less social interaction and participation among members, lower quality relationships between supervisors and subordinates, lower satisfaction and commitment, lower collectivism, and higher absenteeism (Colquitt, Noe, & Jackson, 2002;Green et al, 1996;Hare, 1981;Kozlowski & Bell, 2003;LePine & Van Dyne, 1998;Markham, Dansereau, & Alutto, 1982). These process inefficiencies appear likely to inhibit the ability to manage the competing socialization and customer service demands brought on by turnover.…”
Section: Voluntary Turnover Rates and Service Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research suggests three responses is a sufficient number to aggregate to the unit level (Colquitt et al, 2002;Mayer et al 2009a;Richardson and Vandenberg, 2005;Schneider et al, 1998;Tracey and Tews, 2005). We also collected data from 327 unit supervisors; however, not all supervisor surveys had corresponding employee surveys with at least three responses, nor did all employee surveys have corresponding supervisor data.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals are bound by the organizational context in their behaviors [14], and importantly, findings at the individual level should not be assumed to be equivalent at other levels [15]. Thus, an examination of workplace incivility at the team level is needed because the use of team practices is currently prevalent, and such practices are critical to the success (or survival) of organizations [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%