1980
DOI: 10.1016/0368-2048(80)80001-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-shell excitation spectra of CO, N2 and O2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
137
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
16
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Compared with gas-phase O 2 (18) schematically illustrated in Fig. 1, these high-pressure oxygen phases display similar spectral features because of the transitions of 1s core-level electrons to the antibonding 1 g * and 3 u * orbitals (hereafter referred to as * and * transitions, respectively), which provide a direct indication of their molecular nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Compared with gas-phase O 2 (18) schematically illustrated in Fig. 1, these high-pressure oxygen phases display similar spectral features because of the transitions of 1s core-level electrons to the antibonding 1 g * and 3 u * orbitals (hereafter referred to as * and * transitions, respectively), which provide a direct indication of their molecular nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D) confirm the presence of a remnant siderite and show a spectroscopic signature for the transformed carbonate with a main peak shifted at 290.7 eV. The smaller peak at 287.5 eV corresponds to the presence of carbon monoxide (CO) (25) probably present as inclusions/nanobubbles that give the particular microstructure of this high-pressure phase (Fig. 2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The main uncertainty in the photon energy determination results from the uncertainties, given in the literature, for the energies of the absorption lines used for calibration. To our knowledge, all the synchrotron radiation based experiments on the K-shell photoionization of O 2 refer to the electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) works of Brion and co-workers [32,33]. They determined the energy of the 1s → 1π * transition at 530.8 eV with a stated accuracy of ±200 meV.…”
Section: Excitation Source and Energy Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They determined the energy of the 1s → 1π * transition at 530.8 eV with a stated accuracy of ±200 meV. By measuring the ion yield in a gas cell, Coreno and co-workers [34] improved the accuracy for this line to ±100 meV by normalization on the 1s → 1π * transition EELS measurements, both for O 2 [33] and CO [35], the latter being quoted to an accuracy of ±90 meV. To double-check this determination independently of the relatively low-resolution EELS measurements, we used a Scienta electron spectrometer installed on a second branch of the PLEIADES beam line.…”
Section: Excitation Source and Energy Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%