1999
DOI: 10.1080/095382599107020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kalecki Versus Keynes on the Determinants of Investment

Abstract: This paper explores the differences between the investment theories of Michal Kalecki and John Maynard Keynes. We argue that Kalecki's ideas (and empirical support for them) are necessary for Keynes's arguments regarding the determination of the level of effective demand. Kalecki's theory of the role of finance in investment also provides a fuller understanding of the importance of liquidity concerns for Keynesian theory and connects the theory of effective demand to the logic of capitalism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Investment is an intrinsically dynamic process (Bond and Meghir, 1994;Lopez and Mott, 1999) and there is a path dependency which links past and future levels of investment. Therefore, in line with the literature, our specification includes lagged investment as an explanatory variable (Ford and Poret, 1991;Kopcke and Brauman, 2001;Orhangazi, 2008).…”
Section: Specifications Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investment is an intrinsically dynamic process (Bond and Meghir, 1994;Lopez and Mott, 1999) and there is a path dependency which links past and future levels of investment. Therefore, in line with the literature, our specification includes lagged investment as an explanatory variable (Ford and Poret, 1991;Kopcke and Brauman, 2001;Orhangazi, 2008).…”
Section: Specifications Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the Post-Keynesian theory, capital accumulation is an intrinsically dynamic process (Kalecki, 1954;Lopez and Mott, 1999). Physical investment is an irreversible phenomenon.…”
Section: The Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Véase, por ejemplo, Blinder (2006).4 El intercambio de cartas se encuentra enOsiatyńsky (1990). Véanse tambiénLópez y Mott (1999) y López y Assous (2010).…”
unclassified