2009
DOI: 10.1080/00207170903273987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kalman filter-based identification for systems with randomly missing measurements in a network environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the LMI method and delay-dependent technique, sufficient conditions are derived for the exponentially mean-square stability of the filteringerror dynamics. Shi and Fang [49] considered the problem of parameter estimation and output estimation for systems in a transmission control protocol (TCP). The input and output missing data is modeled as two separate Bernoulli processes characterised by probabilities of missing data, and a recursive algorithm for parameter estimation by modifying the KF-based algorithm is developed.…”
Section: Filtering For Linear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the LMI method and delay-dependent technique, sufficient conditions are derived for the exponentially mean-square stability of the filteringerror dynamics. Shi and Fang [49] considered the problem of parameter estimation and output estimation for systems in a transmission control protocol (TCP). The input and output missing data is modeled as two separate Bernoulli processes characterised by probabilities of missing data, and a recursive algorithm for parameter estimation by modifying the KF-based algorithm is developed.…”
Section: Filtering For Linear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rarely do the conditions necessary for optimality actually exist, and yet, the filter apparently works well for many applications in spite of this situation. Application of Kalman filter in dynamic prediction for corporate financial state consists of five steps [27,28]:…”
Section: Dynamic Prediction Models Based On Kalman Filtering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when the sensors send their measurements to the processing center via a communication network some additional network-induced phenomena, such as random delays or measurement losses, inevitably arise during this transmission process, which can spoil the fusion estimators performance and motivate the design of fusion estimation algorithms for systems with one (or even several) of the aforementioned uncertainties (see e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], and references therein). All the above cited papers on signal estimation with random transmission delays assume independent random delays at each sensor and mutually independent delays between the different sensors; in [25] this restriction was weakened and random delays featuring correlation at consecutive sampling times were considered, thus allowing to deal with some common practical situations (e.g., those in which two consecutive observations cannot be delayed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%