2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/809734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kalman Filtering for Discrete Stochastic Systems with Multiplicative Noises and Random Two-Step Sensor Delays

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the optimal Kalman filtering problem for a class of discrete stochastic systems with multiplicative noises and random two-step sensor delays. Three Bernoulli distributed random variables with known conditional probabilities are introduced to characterize the phenomena of the random two-step sensor delays which may happen during the data transmission. By using the state augmentation approach and innovation analysis technique, an optimal Kalman filter is constructed for the augmented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we derive the recursive formulas to obtain the matrices r (ij) k , which clearly satisfy Equation (20) just by using Equation (9) and defining J (ij)…”
Section: Proof Equation (19) For σ (Ij)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we derive the recursive formulas to obtain the matrices r (ij) k , which clearly satisfy Equation (20) just by using Equation (9) and defining J (ij)…”
Section: Proof Equation (19) For σ (Ij)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when the sensors send their measurements to the processing center via a communication network some additional network-induced phenomena, such as random delays or measurement losses, inevitably arise during this transmission process, which can spoil the fusion estimators performance and motivate the design of fusion estimation algorithms for systems with one (or even several) of the aforementioned uncertainties (see e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], and references therein). All the above cited papers on signal estimation with random transmission delays assume independent random delays at each sensor and mutually independent delays between the different sensors; in [25] this restriction was weakened and random delays featuring correlation at consecutive sampling times were considered, thus allowing to deal with some common practical situations (e.g., those in which two consecutive observations cannot be delayed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, centralized and distributed fusion algorithms are obtained in [15] for uncertain systems with correlated noises and in [5] for systems where the measurements might randomly contain only partial information about the signal. Also in [16] for systems with multiplicative noise and two-step random transmission delays, the centralized and distributed fusion estimation problems are addressed by using the state augmentation approach and, even though white noises are considered in the original model, the observation noises of the augmented system are correlated. Autocorrelated and cross-correlated noises have also been considered in systems with random parameter matrices and transmission uncertainties; some results on the fusion estimation problems in these systems can be found in [17,18], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These additional transmission uncertainties can spoil the fusion estimators performance and motivate the need of designing fusion estimation algorithms that take their effects into consideration. In recent years, in response to the popularity of networked stochastic systems, the fusion estimation problem from observations with random delays and packet dropouts, which may happen during the data transmission, has been one of the mainstream research topics (see, e.g., [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], and references therein). All the above papers on signal estimation with random transmission delays assume independent random delays in each sensor and mutually independent delays between the different network sensors; in [ 31 ] this restriction was weakened and random delays featuring correlation at consecutive sampling times were considered, thus allowing to deal with common practical situations (e.g., those in which two consecutive observations cannot be delayed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%