2014
DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-2543-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kalman filters for assimilating near-surface observations into the Richards equation – Part 3: Retrieving states and parameters from laboratory evaporation experiments

Abstract: Abstract. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of a dual Kalman filter procedure in retrieving states and parameters of a one-dimensional soil water budget model based on the Richards equation, by assimilating near-surface soil water content values during evaporation experiments carried out under laboratory conditions. The experimental data set consists of simultaneously measured evaporation rates, soil water content and matric potential profiles. The parameters identified by assimilating th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil hydraulic parameter uncertainty is identified as a major uncertainty source in vadose zone hydrology, and many studies have been focused on this topic. A highly relevant research area, inverse modeling, has been developed to reduce the uncertainty of the parameter by incorporating observational data (Erdal et al, 2014;Montzka et al, 2011;Margulis, 2011, 2013). Boundary conditions also introduce uncertainty during the simulation of soil water flow (Ataie-Ashtiani et al, 1999;Forsyth et al, 1995;Szomolay, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil hydraulic parameter uncertainty is identified as a major uncertainty source in vadose zone hydrology, and many studies have been focused on this topic. A highly relevant research area, inverse modeling, has been developed to reduce the uncertainty of the parameter by incorporating observational data (Erdal et al, 2014;Montzka et al, 2011;Margulis, 2011, 2013). Boundary conditions also introduce uncertainty during the simulation of soil water flow (Ataie-Ashtiani et al, 1999;Forsyth et al, 1995;Szomolay, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of testing the algorithm with a synthetic study is that, by knowing the true system, the results are not overshadowed by other sources of uncertainty: a fundamental aspect that should be addressed prior to evaluating algorithm performance with real data, as in the study presented by Medina et al (2014).…”
Section: Synthetic Experimental Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil water in the vadose zone exerts a large control on the water and energy balance of land-atmosphere systems over a wide range of space-time scales (e.g. Milly and Dunne, 1994;Entekhabi et al, 1996;Vrugt et al, 2001Vrugt et al, , 2003Rodriguez-Iturbe and Porporato, 2005). With the increasing availability of near-surface data from remote and ground-based sensors, unique opportunities emerge to predict the soil water dynamics (McLaughlin, 2002;Vereecken et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%