1980
DOI: 10.1093/sf/59.1.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kanawha County Revisited: Reply to Billings and Goldman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… In general, the media referred to the Kanawha County textbook controversy as a matter of “class warfare” in ways that invoked an established narrative of class consciousness. Specifically, in the pages of the Social Forces , Billings and Goldman (1979) differed with Page and Clelland (1978; see also Clelland and Page 1980) about the source of the conflict, relying on the established history of coal wars and the class consciousness attributed to them (Mason 2005, 354–59). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… In general, the media referred to the Kanawha County textbook controversy as a matter of “class warfare” in ways that invoked an established narrative of class consciousness. Specifically, in the pages of the Social Forces , Billings and Goldman (1979) differed with Page and Clelland (1978; see also Clelland and Page 1980) about the source of the conflict, relying on the established history of coal wars and the class consciousness attributed to them (Mason 2005, 354–59). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%