1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-2527(98)00027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kant on Criminal Law and Psychiatry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the “retributive justice theory” (cf. Kant, 1780/; Mooij, ), justice is restored when the perpetrator suffers an equal amount of psychological pain as the victim or ‐ in this context ‐ the bereaved individual. This could be accomplished by bereaved individuals themselves (through acts of retaliation) or through government, by legal punitive sanction (Kunst, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the “retributive justice theory” (cf. Kant, 1780/; Mooij, ), justice is restored when the perpetrator suffers an equal amount of psychological pain as the victim or ‐ in this context ‐ the bereaved individual. This could be accomplished by bereaved individuals themselves (through acts of retaliation) or through government, by legal punitive sanction (Kunst, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priests might be asked to comment on the moral qualities of perpetrators (see Skalevag, 2006). Kant, who acknowledged that offenders who were not able to exercise free will, were not accountable and should not be punished, argued that the forensic role should not be given to physicians as experts on the body, but to those who had studied the human mind, that is to say philosophers (Mooij, 1998).…”
Section: Legal Traditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%