2020
DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2020.1918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypic Diversification in Two Megaleporinus Species (Characiformes, Anostomidae) Inferred from In Situ Localization of Repetitive DNA Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, snDNA gene mapping has shown variations in the number of sites in other loricariids, as observed in Peckoltia species (Hypostominae, Peckoltia clade), where single and multiple U1 snDNA sites occur between different species [ 10 ]. Thus, although the in situ locations of these sequences may indicate stability at the chromosomal level, chromosomal and molecular diversity has been observed for this group for repetitive sequences in the genomes of different fish species [ 18 , 52 , 53 ]. Therefore, analyzing the in situ locations of other snDNA genes, as well as the molecular diversity of this gene family in the genomes of Pseudacanthicus species, may reveal important mechanisms of chromosomal diversification involving this group of repetitive sequences in this group of fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, snDNA gene mapping has shown variations in the number of sites in other loricariids, as observed in Peckoltia species (Hypostominae, Peckoltia clade), where single and multiple U1 snDNA sites occur between different species [ 10 ]. Thus, although the in situ locations of these sequences may indicate stability at the chromosomal level, chromosomal and molecular diversity has been observed for this group for repetitive sequences in the genomes of different fish species [ 18 , 52 , 53 ]. Therefore, analyzing the in situ locations of other snDNA genes, as well as the molecular diversity of this gene family in the genomes of Pseudacanthicus species, may reveal important mechanisms of chromosomal diversification involving this group of repetitive sequences in this group of fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data indicate that these gene families can be equally dynamic in the genomes of species of Peckoltia. Several chromosomal sites of rDNA and snDNA sequences are observed in different groups of fish, such as species of the Loricariidae, Cichlidae and Anostomidae families; the emergence of new chromosomal sites is related to the association of these sequences with active mobile elements in these organisms (Kapitonov and Jurka, 2006;Cabral-de-Melo et al, 2012;Dulz et al, 2020). Future analyzes of rDNA and snDNA nucleotide sequences will be essential to verify the possible involvement of transposable elements in the movement of these sequences in the genomes of Peckoltia species.…”
Section: Karyotype Diversity In Peckoltiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small nuclear RNA genes (snDNA) represent another multigene family involved in the splicing and maturation process of messenger RNA encoded by the U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6 snRNA genes (Busch et al, 1982). The snDNA sequences have been used as chromosomal markers for detailed comparative chromosome analysis in several groups of organisms, including fish, reptiles and arthropods (Cabralde-Melo et al, 2012;Almeida et al, 2017;Cavalcante et al, 2020;Dulz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellite (CA) 15 and (GA) 15 probes marked the terminal region of both arms in most of the chromosomes in both species, a pattern that is observed in the autosomes of species with sex chromosome systems, whereas the heteromorphic sex chromosomes have specific accumulation patterns of distinct repetitive DNA classes (Parise-Maltempi et al 2007;Cioffi et al 2012;Marreta et al 2012;Poltronieri et al 2014;Utsunomia et al 2019;Dulz et al 2020). The differential interstitial markings, observed in both male and female chromosome complements, can be used as an additional cytotaxonomic marker to distinguish H. copelandii from H. steindachneri (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%