2009
DOI: 10.1525/as.2009.49.6.924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kashmir's Secessionist Movement Resurfaces: Ethnic Identity, Community Competition, and the State

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. University of California Press

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the British exit from India earlier that year, the princely state of Kashmir as well as the 560 other princely states had been advised by the departing colonial power to join either of the two dominions—India or Pakistan. The then Maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh, hesitating to join India, was forced to request military assistance from India as he was unable to defend Kashmir from the invasion by the tribal raiders (Tremblay, 2009, p. 927). His hesitation was prompted by two factors.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the British exit from India earlier that year, the princely state of Kashmir as well as the 560 other princely states had been advised by the departing colonial power to join either of the two dominions—India or Pakistan. The then Maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh, hesitating to join India, was forced to request military assistance from India as he was unable to defend Kashmir from the invasion by the tribal raiders (Tremblay, 2009, p. 927). His hesitation was prompted by two factors.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National governments at the centre took great care to manipulate the local political scene in J&K in order to push integration of the state with India. The 1952 Jammu agitation and Abdullah’s independent-minded response prompted the Indian state to begin integrating the state of J&K into the Indian federation as a matter of deliberate policy (Tremblay, 2009).…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wake of abrogation of the special status guaranteed by Article 370 and political leadership subject to scrutiny by the Indian government, official nationalism, symbolized, for instance, by celebration of events related to Indian nationhood-Independence Day, Republic Day etc. -became increasingly irrelevant to the majority of Hazarat Bal Mosque' (Tremblay, 1996(Tremblay, -1997 was so complete that 'not even a hawker was to be seen' (Habibullah, 2008: 28 However, in 1987, Farooq was brought back in power in the aftermath of the Farooq-Rajiv Gandhi Accord and accompanied by massive rigging of elections (Tremblay, 2009: 935).…”
Section: Intervention and Imposition Of The Indian Nationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facade that Kashmir cannot be divided fell apart in 2008 when a renewed movement for azadi erupted in the aftermath of the Amarnath land controversy that essentially pitted the valley's Muslim population seeking independence or unification with Pakistan against Jammu's Hindus who support complete integration with India (Tremblay: 2009). This outright confrontation between the state's two main communities sheds light on the delusional fiction of treating the state as a whole.…”
Section: A Revised Kashmiri Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most Kashmiris vote to ensure that their basic necessities for bijli (electricity), pani (water), and sadak (roads) are fulfilled (cf. Tremblay, 2009: 925), although in many instances, in particular during the 1996 elections, people were forcibly dragged out of their homes to vote. In no way, then, as Reeta Tremblay argues, should “electoral participation” be seen an “affirmation of Indian rule in Kashmir” (2009: 925).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%