1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02571659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kazhdan's property (T) and amenable representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would like to thank the referee for helpful comments and suggestions that lead to a better presentation of the article, and for informing us that one can use the materials in [4] to obtain (T5) ⇒ (T1) for general countable groups (we only had Proposition 4.3 in the original version.) We would also like to thank Prof. Roger Howe for helpful discussion leading to a simpler argument for Theorem 4.1.…”
Section: Acknowledgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to thank the referee for helpful comments and suggestions that lead to a better presentation of the article, and for informing us that one can use the materials in [4] to obtain (T5) ⇒ (T1) for general countable groups (we only had Proposition 4.3 in the original version.) We would also like to thank Prof. Roger Howe for helpful discussion leading to a simpler argument for Theorem 4.1.…”
Section: Acknowledgementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the action in the conjecture is in fact unitary, then by the result of [3], the representation cannot be amenable in the sense of Bekka. Hence by Proposition 4.2, Zelmanov's conjecture holds for unitary representations.…”
Section: The Construction Of a Non-amenable Skew Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalizing the original proof, for example, would require a modification of [10, Proposition 3.2, (T2)] combined with the construction of Vaes [62, Proposition 3.1] that produces, from a unitary co-representation "arising from an orthogonal co-representation", an action on a free Araki-Woods factor preserving the free quasi-free state. [5,Theorem 1], [4,Theorem 2.12.9] generalize to LCQGs? That is, are the following conditions equivalent for a LCQG G?…”
Section: Question 42 Does the Connes-weiss Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%