2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.621295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KCNQ5 and C9orf50 Methylation in Stool DNA for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: BackgroundAberrant DNA methylation has emerged as a class of promising biomarkers for early colorectal cancer (CRC) detection, but the performance of methylated C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 in stool DNA has never been evaluated.MethodsMethylation specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for methylated C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 were developed. The methylation levels of C9orf50 and KCNQ5 in 198 CRC patients, 20 advanced adenoma (AA) patients, 101 small polyp (SP) patients, and 141 no evidence of disease (NED) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As single biomarkers, CLIP4 was evaluated in one study [ 72 ], TWIST1 in three articles [ 73 , 74 , 75 ], and LINE-1 in two [ 76 , 77 ]. A panel of methylated biomarkers was also employed—C9orf50 was assessed together with CLIP4 and KCNQ5 [ 78 ], with TWIST1 [ 79 ] or just with KCNQ5 [ 80 ]. Other potential biomarkers and their performance are displayed in Table S4 [ 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As single biomarkers, CLIP4 was evaluated in one study [ 72 ], TWIST1 in three articles [ 73 , 74 , 75 ], and LINE-1 in two [ 76 , 77 ]. A panel of methylated biomarkers was also employed—C9orf50 was assessed together with CLIP4 and KCNQ5 [ 78 ], with TWIST1 [ 79 ] or just with KCNQ5 [ 80 ]. Other potential biomarkers and their performance are displayed in Table S4 [ 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a sensitivity of 77.3–85.9% and specificity of 91.5–95% has been shown for the stool-based methylated KCNQ and C9orf50 for all stage CRC detection. And when methylated C9orf50 and KCNQ5 were combined, the sensitivity for CRC detection was improved to 88.4% [ 41 ]. In addition, the methylation of multiple genes ( vimentin , NDRG4 , BMP3 , and TFPI2 ) combine with KRAS mutations in stool DNA were reported by Ahlquist et al, this test was able to detect CRC and precancerous adenoma with sensitivities of 85 and 54%, respectively, at a specificity of 90% [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observed clinical sensitivity and specificity results were comparable with the result reported by Han et al [ 36 ] and higher than aforementioned studies [ 9 , 31 ]. Since most other markers have not been reported for more detailed evaluation of the clinical performance of detecting different stages of CRC, the sensitivity of methylated SDC2 for all stage CRC could be compared to those of methylated C9orf50 and KCNQ5 [ 41 ], which were very similar among all three methylation markers. Therefore, using detection of two SDC2 methylation fragments can improve clinical performance for the early diagnosis of CRC, without losing specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding unqualified samples (only Stage I/II samples were selected), there were 268 primary carcinoma samples and 239 normal samples. After normalization using ‘champ.norm’ function in the package R ‘Champ’ and filtration by the probe annotated by the corresponding annotation files for each data set, intact data of candidate methylated genes (SDC2, NDRG4, KCNQ5, WIF1, TFPI2, and ALX4), which were selected based on a PubMed library literature search, were collected and analyzed using the package R ‘Champ’ with an adjusted p-value <0.05 and a deltaBeta value >0.2 ( 13 , 21 23 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%