2011
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia

Abstract: This article sum up that Judicial Commission (JC) in Indonesia has a strong position in the constitution, UUD 1945 (after amendment). Its JC's position is legally considered a similar position with The Supreme Court and Constitutional Court. In practice, however, its JC's function is less effective to be an external control against judges code of conduct. Three factors are involved to make the JC fails to establish control effectively. One is the decreasing integrity of the JC due to the fact that The Deputy o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…peran pengawasan internal yang dilakukan MA tidak efektif, karena kerap digunakan sebagai upaya melindungi oknum yang berbuat salah atas nama semangat korps. (Thontowi, 2011)…”
Section: Komisi Yudisial (Ky)unclassified
“…peran pengawasan internal yang dilakukan MA tidak efektif, karena kerap digunakan sebagai upaya melindungi oknum yang berbuat salah atas nama semangat korps. (Thontowi, 2011)…”
Section: Komisi Yudisial (Ky)unclassified
“…This commission has a very important and strategic role in procuring the judicial process, so it must run well. In fact, the Judicial Commission has not been able to function properly and effectively in supervising and controlling the behavior of judges (Thontowi, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%