2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Keep withstanding”: Territory in the body, home and market in Xinjiang, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is a socio-spatial concept [37]. In this view, territories reflect historical dynamics [38] and are not on a longterm scale. Thus, spatial expressions of the "domination of nature" of the capitalist mode of production coexist with specific social groups that maintain traditional social relations and precapitalist forms of economy that embody less aggressive ways of life [37].…”
Section: Territory and Socio-spatial Development In Liberation Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is a socio-spatial concept [37]. In this view, territories reflect historical dynamics [38] and are not on a longterm scale. Thus, spatial expressions of the "domination of nature" of the capitalist mode of production coexist with specific social groups that maintain traditional social relations and precapitalist forms of economy that embody less aggressive ways of life [37].…”
Section: Territory and Socio-spatial Development In Liberation Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Lesutis (2021) shows how plans for a China‐funded railway in Kenya provoked public anxieties about neo‐colonialism, dredging up social memories of colonial infrastructural projects. In Xinjiang, Tynen (2021) reports how Uyghurs describe feelings of being sick, tired and depressed upon encounters with Chinese state authorities. We contribute to this literature by explicitly linking infrastructure and emotion, together with scholars across the social sciences who highlight infrastructure's affective and ontological characteristics (Appel et al, 2015; Carse, 2014; Cowen, 2014; Dalakoglou & Kallianos, 2018; Graham & Marvin, 2002; Harvey & Knox, 2015; Larkin, 2013; Murton, 2017; Reeves, 2017), including in the Myanmar context (Kiik, 2020; Sarma et al, 2022).…”
Section: Towards An Emotional Geopolitics Of Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Tynen (2021) analyzes acts of refusal by the Uyghur population in China, which underscores both the ideological and materials ways in which minority populations work within and outside of state mechanisms of control and management. In other cases state violence continues through various mechanisms of spatial and situational exclusions.…”
Section: Populism and Violent Exclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%