2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1124/8/081031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kelvin probe microscopy of MoSe2 monolayers on graphene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
6
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it was clear that the oxidation influenced the bilayer region differently than the monolayer regions. Interestingly, bilayers atop the oxidized region showed a potential higher even than the basal plane, whereas bilayers on the basal plane showed a much lower potential consistent with literature values in pristine TMD flakes 23,61,62 . This is hypothesized to be due to potentially different oxidative states within the material such as chemisorption of oxygen to the bilayer rather than physisorption.…”
Section: Tracking Oxidation and Agingsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, it was clear that the oxidation influenced the bilayer region differently than the monolayer regions. Interestingly, bilayers atop the oxidized region showed a potential higher even than the basal plane, whereas bilayers on the basal plane showed a much lower potential consistent with literature values in pristine TMD flakes 23,61,62 . This is hypothesized to be due to potentially different oxidative states within the material such as chemisorption of oxygen to the bilayer rather than physisorption.…”
Section: Tracking Oxidation and Agingsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…KPFM measures the contact potential difference (CPD) 39 to produce a relative work function map of the surface. It is wellknown that KPFM can see changes in work function in 2D materials due to a change in layer number, grain boundaries, and chemical changes like defect densities 23,40 . The phase map is less well-studied, but can generally be considered analogous to surface dielectric properties (see Supplementary Information: KPFM Operation and Theory) 26,39,40 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From that, one can derive that Sample 1 is less p‐type conducting than Sample 2 or 3 (2 and 3 are better hole‐selective contacts), because its Fermi level is shifted away from the valence band edge. The work function of MoSe 2 was studied by Borodin et al using Kelvin probe microscopy 32 . They showed that Wf depends on the number of MoSe 2 layers with a saturating value of 4.50 eV for the bulk material, which agrees well with our results of Samples 2A/B and 3B.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The work function of MoSe 2 was studied by Borodin et al using Kelvin probe microscopy. 32 They showed that W f depends on the number of MoSe 2 layers with a saturating value of 4.50 eV for the bulk material, which agrees well with our results of Samples 2A/B and 3B. All ionization potentials are equal within the measurement uncertainty of ±0.20 eV, and in particular, there is not much difference between Samples 2 and 3, although their Se/S ratio varies by almost a factor of 2.…”
Section: Electronic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 88%