2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep41069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kernel-based Joint Feature Selection and Max-Margin Classification for Early Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract: Feature selection methods usually select the most compact and relevant set of features based on their contribution to a linear regression model. Thus, these features might not be the best for a non-linear classifier. This is especially crucial for the tasks, in which the performance is heavily dependent on the feature selection techniques, like the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders, which progresses slowly while affects the q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
42
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by [18, 13], the HIV specific pattern, identified in the Selection Step during training, is defined by the optimal ‘weight’ vector specifying a linear multivariate model defined by image measurements that correctly label subjects according to the MKL model. MKL classifies samples by learning the optimal pairings between kernels and image measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inspired by [18, 13], the HIV specific pattern, identified in the Selection Step during training, is defined by the optimal ‘weight’ vector specifying a linear multivariate model defined by image measurements that correctly label subjects according to the MKL model. MKL classifies samples by learning the optimal pairings between kernels and image measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal ‘weight’ vector now depends on the weight C of the term measuring classification accuracy and the weight λ of the term measuring group sparsity within the MKL cost function (refer to Appendix A for more details). As in [13, 53], the search space for those two hyperparameters is {10 −3 , 10 −2 , 10 −1 , 1, 10 1 , 10 2 , 10 3 }. To identify the best hyperparameter setting, we perform 5-fold inner cross-validation 10 times.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the data heterogeneity across the modalities (modality heterogeneity for short) is also ignored in their formulations. On the other hand, though the advanced machine learning method such as Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL), is able to model the complex data-to-label relationship of heterogeneous multimodality data [2,7,13], it is currently only applicable to the set of complete data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, they face a deficiency, namely, the feature spaces extracted from EEG signals can induce significant and complex variations regarding the nonlinearity and sparsity of the manifolds that hardly can be encoded by linear decompositions (Sturm et al, 2016 ). Moreover, based on their contribution to a linear regression model, linear dimensionality reduction methods usually select the most compact and relevant set of features, which might not be the best option for a non-linear classifier (Adeli et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%