2005
DOI: 10.1139/z04-158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homoplasies?

Abstract: Four chordate characters -dorsal hollow nerve cord, notochord, gill slits, and endostyle -are compared morphologically, molecularly, and functionally with similar structures in hemichordates to assess their putative homologies. The dorsal hollow nerve cord and enteropneust neurocord are probably homoplasies. The neurocord (= collar cord) may be an autapomorphy of Enteropneusta that innervates a unique pair of muscles, the perihemal coelomic muscles. Despite the apparent lack of organ-level homology, chordates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Inverting the phylogenetic position of tunicates and cephalochordates within monophyletic chordates highlights the prevalence of morphological simplification with characters that are likely ancestral for chordates, such as metameric segmentation, being lost secondarily in the tunicate lineage. On the other hand, the loss of preoral kidney and the presence of multiciliated epithelial cells might in fact constitute morphological synapomorphies for olfactores (Ruppert, 2005). The new chordate phylogeny further portrays tunicates as highly derived chordates with specialized lifestyles and developmental modes, whereas cephalochordates might have retained more ancestral chordate characteristics.…”
Section: Implications For Chordate Evo-devomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Inverting the phylogenetic position of tunicates and cephalochordates within monophyletic chordates highlights the prevalence of morphological simplification with characters that are likely ancestral for chordates, such as metameric segmentation, being lost secondarily in the tunicate lineage. On the other hand, the loss of preoral kidney and the presence of multiciliated epithelial cells might in fact constitute morphological synapomorphies for olfactores (Ruppert, 2005). The new chordate phylogeny further portrays tunicates as highly derived chordates with specialized lifestyles and developmental modes, whereas cephalochordates might have retained more ancestral chordate characteristics.…”
Section: Implications For Chordate Evo-devomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the uncertainty over the relationships of the major groups within the hemichordates, the possible homology of this extension to the pterobranch stalk, and even more controversially, the chordate post-anal tail, remains unresolved Swalla & Smith 2008 1996). Most of these are now rather weakly supported by both morphological and molecular datasets (Peterson et al 1999;Nieuwenhuys 2002;Lowe et al 2003Lowe et al , 2006Ruppert 2005). However, only gill slits, as primary ciliated pouches, may represent an ancestral feature of the deuterostomes (Ogasawara et al 1999;Okai et al 2000;Tagawa et al 2001;Cameron 2002;Rychel et al 2006;Rychel & Swalla 2007) and possibly the post-anal tail (Lowe et al 2003).…”
Section: Problems Reconstructing Ancestral Deuterostome Charactersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where topological data in fossils are equivocal, other homology criteria, normally subordinate to topology assume greater importance [9][10][11] . Here we apply the criterion of the intrinsic properties of body parts (also referred to as 'special qualities'' 10 or 'correspondence of composition' 11 ) allowing us to resolve the phylogenetic placement of Tullimonstrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%