2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing

Abstract: The availability of workflows for data publishing could have an enormous impact on researchers, research practices and publishing paradigms, as well as on funding strategies and career and research evaluations. We present the generic components of such workflows to provide a reference model for these stakeholders. The RDA-WDS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The FORCE11 FAIR Data Publishing Group built on these the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Re-usable) principles for data sharing (FORCE11, 2017). Additional standardization initiatives investigate the data publishing workflows and develop reference models, like the RDA/WDS Workflows Working Group (Austin et al, 2016). Others focus on data review and its integration in the scholarly publishing processing (Mayernik et al, 2015).…”
Section: Citations Of Static and Evolving Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FORCE11 FAIR Data Publishing Group built on these the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Re-usable) principles for data sharing (FORCE11, 2017). Additional standardization initiatives investigate the data publishing workflows and develop reference models, like the RDA/WDS Workflows Working Group (Austin et al, 2016). Others focus on data review and its integration in the scholarly publishing processing (Mayernik et al, 2015).…”
Section: Citations Of Static and Evolving Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group identified reference models that could be adopted by those venturing into data publishing for the first time and highlighted important gaps and challenges worthy of further consideration. [15] One of these gaps is the issue of identifying and exposing links between articles and datasets. This has been the focus of another RDA/WDS working group that has defined a high-level interoperability framework for scholarly link exchange called Scholix, [16] as well as a proof of concept Data-Literature Interlinking Service.…”
Section: Connecting Chemistry With Global Challenges Through Data Stamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of research data, associated metadata, accompanying documentation, and software code -known as research data publication (Austin et al, 2016) -should be done in such a manner that these items can be discovered on the Web and referred to in a unique and persistent way (Austin et al, 2016). Currently, we have proven techniques for data publication, but lack connections between repositories and other platforms used "downstream" in the research cycle (Dallmeier-Tiessen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 99%