2013
DOI: 10.1108/ejim-08-2012-0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key determinants of the successful adoption of new product development methods

Abstract: PurposeIn recent years, scholars have devoted increasing attention to the use of methods in new product development. Although their positive impact on product success has been confirmed by a series of studies, little research has so far been conducted into the determinants of the successful method application. The purpose of this paper is to analyze two key determinants for the successful use of methods.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts a structural equation modeling approach and analyzes the subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effective roles of top management support include actively influencing the stakeholders through resource provision, negotiation, persuasion, and motivating powerful parties to support the implementers (Boonstra 2006). The role of top management support as an important success factor in new product development have been recognized by a number of studies (Clark and Wheelwright 1995;Cooper and Kleinschmidt 2007;Craig and Hart 1992;Graner and Mißler-Behr 2013;Henard and Szymanski 2001;Salomo et al 2010;Zirger and Maidique 1990).…”
Section: Top Management Supportmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Effective roles of top management support include actively influencing the stakeholders through resource provision, negotiation, persuasion, and motivating powerful parties to support the implementers (Boonstra 2006). The role of top management support as an important success factor in new product development have been recognized by a number of studies (Clark and Wheelwright 1995;Cooper and Kleinschmidt 2007;Craig and Hart 1992;Graner and Mißler-Behr 2013;Henard and Szymanski 2001;Salomo et al 2010;Zirger and Maidique 1990).…”
Section: Top Management Supportmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Chai & Xin, 2006;Graner & Mißler-Behr, 2013;Nijssen & Frambach, 2000), their deficiencies (e.g. Mahajan & Wind, 1992;Nijssen & Lieshout, 1995), level of satisfaction with them (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method appeared once, technique three times and tool seven times. Although the term method is used only once among the keywords, it is used in the title of six of the collected papers, indicating the recurrence of its use in literature (Araujo, Benedettoneto, Campello, Segre, & Wright, 1996;Creusen, Hultink, & Eling, 2013;Engelbrektsson & Soderman, 2004;Fujita & Matsuo, 2006;Graner & Mißler-Behr, 2013;Nijssen & Lieshout, 1995). Table 1 introduces the purposes of research, types of innovation focused by studies and context of the studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researchers suggest 3 modes by which innovative skills of people can develop i.e. teambased work organization, support for training and flexible work practices which help develop a "learning culture" in order to promote workplace learning (Smith et al, 2012 (Graner & Mißler-Behr, 2013) new product innovation is one of the most important determinants of sustained company performance and therefore represents a key challenge for firms to give attention to competencies of people. Scholars give attention to numerous individual and organizational predictors which can later become a foundation for creative activities (innovative activities) of an enterprise where the competence of individuals is a key (WojtczukTurek & Turek, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%